Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 04:14:22 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it. you mean with msgpackrpc-d? If so, it works, until you run into https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 (when server sends >= 4090 bytes, client hangs forever). we

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

On Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 04:14:22 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: not sure what asdf is? I assume its this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Scientific_Data_Format A file format with a YAML header followed by binary or ascii data. Human readable in design but still has binary/ascii

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

> Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it. you mean with msgpackrpc-d? If so, it works, until you run into https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 (when server sends >= 4090 bytes, client hangs forever). > we switched towards http + asdf not sure what asdf is? On Wed, Jun

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

On Wednesday, 14 June 2017 at 19:55:49 UTC, Yawniek wrote: Msgpack rpc with vibe.d works. We used it. Its extremely fast, youll never get that speed with thrift. I don't think Thrift is fundamentally much different in performance than MessagePack, see e.g.

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

Thanks for the link; last answer was from 2014, and doesn't look like the problem was close to being solved. Any help with how to address this issue would be really appreciated! On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Domain via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Monday, 12 June

Re: anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

On Monday, 12 June 2017 at 18:12:38 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants

anyone using msgpackrpc-d ? it's currently broken and doesn't seem maintained

any help on this would be most welcome: https://github.com/msgpack-rpc/msgpack-rpc-d/issues/16 Unfortunately I find the RPC support in D lacking. Having a good RPC integration for D is key for production use of D where one wants to integrate with other existing services (that could be written in