On Sunday, 1 April 2018 at 18:32:00 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Sunday, 1 April 2018 at 16:48:32 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[...]
Oh I was not aware people would try this :)
I have fixed the build please pull.
Thanks!
On Sunday, 1 April 2018 at 16:48:32 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[...]
What is going on here is that it tries to build the gccjit
backend which is currently in a dysfunctional state.
I am currently getting trying to get libgccjit working such that
I can make use of it's debug output, while I am
On Sunday, 1 April 2018 at 16:48:32 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
[...]
Oh I was not aware people would try this :)
I have fixed the build please pull.
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:46:32 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
85 to 90% maybe.
I expect that there will many bugs which were hidden by newCTFE
not supporting classes, which will now be out in the open and
have to be dealt with.
Also the code is in need of cleanup before I would release it
for
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 10:38:53 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
[snip]
So 1.6 years is 10%, the total is 16 years, and there's 14.4
years left. So 2032.
--
So,em
60% of the time, it works every time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjvQFtlNQ-M
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 08:29:22 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 08:19:39 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:46:32 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:15:20 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 08:29:22 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 08:19:39 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
Ok, so it will take 90% of the total to get to the remaining
10%. So it will be ready for 2028 :-)
huh that's not quite right
The approx time I worked on it is
On Saturday, 31 March 2018 at 08:19:39 UTC, Patrick Schluter
wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:46:32 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:15:20 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
How close are you to finish this?
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:46:32 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:15:20 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
How close are you to finish this?
85 to 90% maybe.
Ok, so it will take 90% of the total to get to
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello Guys,
I took a few days off over easter and I have very good news for
you.
The following code will now compile and execute correctly using
newCTFE.
---
class C
{
int i() {return 1;}
}
class D : C
{
override int i()
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 20:15:20 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
[...]
How close are you to finish this?
85 to 90% maybe.
I expect that there will many bugs which were hidden by newCTFE
not supporting classes, which will now be out
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Have a nice easter.
Stefan
Great, then there's hope.
On Friday, 30 March 2018 at 19:48:02 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello Guys,
I took a few days off over easter and I have very good news for
you.
The following code will now compile and execute correctly using
newCTFE.
---
class C
{
int i() {return 1;}
}
class D : C
{
override int i()
Hello Guys,
I took a few days off over easter and I have very good news for
you.
The following code will now compile and execute correctly using
newCTFE.
---
class C
{
int i() {return 1;}
}
class D : C
{
override int i() {return 2;}
float f() { return 1.0f; }
}
class E : D
{
14 matches
Mail list logo
