On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 21:35 +, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
For the amount of complaining about make, there sure has been
little process in making a better make.
Isn't that the whole point, something better than make is not make, it
is something else.
--
Russel.
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 21:27:47 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 13:56:17 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 13:12 +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I did a `git up` on dmd, druntime and phobos, but phobos
wouldn't build. Weird, but I had to fork
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 20:41:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 4/13/15 7:34 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:24:57PM +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I want to replace those with D scripts for a reason.
Now that dmd is dependent on an
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:07:18 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 08:53 +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
The -j option should be there for tweaking only, by default
I expect a modern tool to just use as many threads as I have
cores. Which of course is
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:07:18 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 08:53 +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
The -j option should be there for tweaking only, by default
I expect a modern tool to just use as many threads as I have
cores. Which of course is
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 08:53 +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
The -j option should be there for tweaking only, by default I
expect a modern tool to just use as many threads as I have cores.
Which of course is exactly what Ninja does.
N-1 not N on a system you are using as a
On 4/14/15 1:53 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 20:41:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 4/13/15 7:34 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:24:57PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I want to replace those with D scripts for a reason.
On 2015-04-14 14:07, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Waf chooses N and it makes the workstation unusable whilst the
compilation is happening.
[…]
I have four cores (if I recall correctly) and I always compile DMD with
-j 16 without any problems.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
That's the typical distinction between batch and interactive
processes; today's schedulers shouldn't have trouble handling
this. If they do, there's still process priorities/nice values
to adjust.
RAM.
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 13:58:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:21:19 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
That's the typical distinction between batch and interactive
processes; today's schedulers shouldn't have trouble handling
this. If they do, there's still
On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 12:07:18 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 08:53 +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
The -j option should be there for tweaking only, by default
I expect a modern tool to just use as many threads as I have
cores. Which of course is
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 14:24:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I want to replace those with D scripts for a reason.
Me too. Let's see if we can actually agree on how they'd end up
looking, huh? ;)
Atila
On 4/13/15 7:34 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:24:57PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I want to replace those with D scripts for a reason.
Now that dmd is dependent on an existing version of dmd to build, it
should be no problem to replace the
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 13:56:17 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 13:12 +, Atila Neves via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I did a `git up` on dmd, druntime and phobos, but phobos
wouldn't build. Weird, but I had to fork phobos anyway, let me
do that. Still wouldn't build. I tried
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 13:12:23 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I did a `git up` on dmd, druntime and phobos, but phobos
wouldn't build. Weird, but I had to fork phobos anyway, let me
do that. Still wouldn't build. I tried `make clean`, can't
remember exactly what happened but that didn't work
On Monday, 13 April 2015 at 21:27:47 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
To be fair, I've seen a lot of new build systems, but not a lot
of better build system.
I keep coming back to makefile, not because it is good, but
because it is not worse than most of the shit I tried, and at
least it is available
On 14/04/2015 1:12 a.m., Atila Neves wrote:
I did a `git up` on dmd, druntime and phobos, but phobos wouldn't build.
Weird, but I had to fork phobos anyway, let me do that. Still wouldn't
build. I tried `make clean`, can't remember exactly what happened but
that didn't work either.
In the end I
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 02:24:57PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I want to replace those with D scripts for a reason.
Now that dmd is dependent on an existing version of dmd to build, it
should be no problem to replace the makefiles with D code. Everytime
something like this happens I
I want to replace those with D scripts for a reason.
On Mon, 2015-04-13 at 13:12 +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I did a `git up` on dmd, druntime and phobos, but phobos wouldn't
build. Weird, but I had to fork phobos anyway, let me do that.
Still wouldn't build. I tried `make clean`, can't remember
exactly what happened but that
I did a `git up` on dmd, druntime and phobos, but phobos wouldn't
build. Weird, but I had to fork phobos anyway, let me do that.
Still wouldn't build. I tried `make clean`, can't remember
exactly what happened but that didn't work either.
In the end I `rm -rf`ed dmd and druntime, recloned
21 matches
Mail list logo
