On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 at 00:36:04 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 at 19:03:11 UTC, ArturG wrote:
would something like this be usefull?
A general word of advice - try to keep your post short &
concise. It is more likely to get replies then.
Yes i might have used to many
On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 at 19:03:11 UTC, ArturG wrote:
would something like this be usefull?
A general word of advice - try to keep your post short & concise.
It is more likely to get replies then.
Yes it would be to me, but I am not sure whether it would justify
the rather uncommon #{}
ive read some discussions about some library solution for the ?.
operator,
has there been anything added to phobos?
wouldnt a checked with expression be a more general/longer form
of the ?. operator?
A with expression not only allows you to do unchecked/checked
access to members but to any
