On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 07:13:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grostad wrote:
Heh, has the Goldbach conjecture been proven undecidable?
Not to my knowledge ;-)
At best, it's a possiblity - which can go either way.
No human or computer will ever make it anything more than that.
Ever.
Someone s
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 07:20:41 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grostad wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 01:16:59 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
That's why we have the concept of 'undefined behaviour'.
Errr, no. High level programming languages don't have
undefined behaviour. That is a C concept
On 2017-11-22 22:41, Walter Bright wrote:
For another example, unreferenced virtual functions never get elided
because a reference to them does exist - they're in the virtual function
pointer table. And then, of course, everything that virtual function
references is never elided.
Yeah, that'
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 13:44:22 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Thats a linker(?) limitation for OMF (or whatever is the win32
object file format).
Was just fixed!
What improvements to D's concurrency model is made possible with
this precise GC?
I recall Martin Nowak saying at DConf
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 10:24:52 UTC, Indigo wrote:
On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 08:59:53 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
On Saturday, 18 November 2017 at 01:31:09 UTC, Indigo wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 17:32:50 UTC, Satoshi wrote:
Hi,
as the title says, I'm looking for a job o
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 12:05:53 UTC, aberba wrote:
When you analyse those points mentioned above you realise that
things are happening exactly. For a writing of almost 2000
years ago.
The writing you mention, can be said to be true for pretty much
any epoch in the evolution of hum
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:08:45 +, codephantom wrote:
> So yeah, you can change the language.. or you can change the way people
> think about their code. When they think differently, their code will
> change accordingly.
>
> My point about sophisticated IDE's and AI like compilers, is that they
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 08:47:43 UTC, codephantom wrote:
Many high level languages let you use 'unsafe' code, where you
can write erroneous operations - and then you're back in the
world of undefined behaviour.
Not many, but many allow interfacing with C, then it is up to
those user
On 11/23/17 02:47, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 13:44:22 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Thats a linker(?) limitation for OMF (or whatever is the win32 object
file format).
Was just fixed!
What improvements to D's concurrency model is made possible with this
precise GC?
I rec
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 20:13:31 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I would focus on a generational GC first for two reasons. The
But generational GC only makes sense if many of your GC objects
have a short life span. I don't think this fits well with
sensible use of a language like D where you
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 18:16:16 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
Perhaps that's why I've never considered nulls to be an issue.
I take proactive steps to protect my code, before the compiler
ever sees it. And actually, I cannot recall any null related
error in any code I've deployed. It's just ne
On Wednesday, 22 November 2017 at 10:20:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
LOL. I assumed that you were legitimately asking what the name
of his compiler was, because I knew that he was writing a D
compiler, whereas you were questioning his
knowledge/credentials. Timon is a very smart guy. He know
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 05:08:39 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 04:13:33 UTC, Indigo wrote:
Wow, no need to get offended
Actually, I was not at all offended.
And we always find it kind of humorous, how people around the
world view Australia. We don't g
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 01:26:49 UTC, Indigo wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 05:08:39 UTC, codephantom
wrote:
[...]
That's good, Australians are known for being hot headed! ;) j/k
[...]
I am working on draining the swamp. You seem like you are
already tired of winning. Amer
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 01:26:49 UTC, Indigo wrote:
Yes, there are good people, what you fail to realize is that
there are very few running the show.
So that's the purpose of having a democracy. You get to say who
runs the show ;-)
If (majority) people wanted Trump running the show,
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 02:18:09 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 01:26:49 UTC, Indigo wrote:
Yes, there are good people, what you fail to realize is that
there are very few running the show.
So that's the purpose of having a democracy. You get to say who
runs t
These posts have nothing to do with D, so please stop posting them. This isn't a
political forum.
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 03:07:57 UTC, Indigo wrote:
If you believe any of our "leaders" are actually leading this
country in the right direction(regardless of party) then you
are an imbecile. I hope you don't believe that. Those that
think Trump is president material are morons. Those
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 04:33:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
These posts have nothing to do with D, so please stop posting
them. This isn't a political forum.
Are you going to go through every other thread, and post the same
comment?
This thread was off topic to begin with.
On 11/23/17 13:40, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 20:13:31 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
I would focus on a generational GC first for two reasons. The
But generational GC only makes sense if many of your GC objects have a
short life span. I don't think this fits well wit
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 04:33:52 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
These posts have nothing to do with D, so please stop posting
them. This isn't a political forum.
Also, perhaps you could delegate the policing of off topic
threads to someone else..??
We could all use your attention elsewhere
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 05:34:14 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
On 11/23/17 13:40, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Thursday, 23 November 2017 at 20:13:31 UTC, Adam Wilson
wrote:
I would focus on a generational GC first for two reasons. The
But generational GC only makes sense if many of your GC
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 05:36:52 UTC, codephantom wrote:
btw. I read somewhere that this forum software can't delete
threads. That sounds pretty silly. Even sillier if it's true.
The forum software is a frontend for a newsgroup server, which
also backs a mailing list. Although it would
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 06:13:59 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 05:36:52 UTC, codephantom wrote:
btw. I read somewhere that this forum software can't delete
threads. That sounds pretty silly. Even sillier if it's true.
The forum software is a frontend for a news
On Friday, 24 November 2017 at 05:34:14 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
RAII+stack allocations make sense when I care about WHEN an
object is released and wish to provide some semblance of
control over deallocation (although as Andrei has pointed out
numerous time, you have no idea how many objects are
25 matches
Mail list logo
