On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 22:01:23 UTC, Manu wrote:
[snip]
Is anyone interested in this issue?
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8677
On Sunday, 2 September 2018 at 01:55:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/1/2018 5:47 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
All in all, John is very non-committal about the whole thing.
He probably got tired of arguing about it :-)
Let's face it, the term "assert" has been poisoned by decades o
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 08:31:49 UTC, John Carter wrote:
On Sunday, 2 September 2018 at 01:55:53 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 9/1/2018 5:47 PM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
All in all, John is very non-committal about the whole thing.
He probably got tired of arguing about it :-)
Last update was long time ago
http://erdani.com/d/downloads.daily.png
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 06:27:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
So, maybe what we should do here is take a page from Weka's
playbook and add a function that does something like check a
condition and then assert(0) if it's false and not try to say
that assertions should always be left in pr
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 04:32:32 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
- --build-only should imply -od.
Maybe...I actually have use cases where I want "--build-only"
but want the executable to be built in the normal cache
location. Build the program and cache it but don't run it yet.
Adding a
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 04:59:08 UTC, Josphe Brigmo wrote:
Yes, but the fact is they would not appreciate my work because
they do not appreciate it now.
I can't really argue against that logic.
But then again, I fail to see when such a situation would apply.
I personally use the tortoi
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 01:27:06 UTC, Josphe Brigmo wrote:
This has nothing to do with git. People think git is the end
all be all. What if git is not available, then what? It's
moronic to think that one has to use one or the other when both
options are available and both only add inform
My entry for the #dbugfix campaign[1]:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17508
This makes building ddox / scod documentation impossible on
Windows.
Reporting date: 2017-06-15
There exists a similar optlink issue (duplicate?) also in linking
vibe.d, reported 2015-10-17:
https://issue
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 11:52:31 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
My entry for the #dbugfix campaign[1]:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17508
This makes building ddox / scod documentation impossible on
Windows.
Reporting date: 2017-06-15
There exists a similar optlink issue (dupl
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 23:33:42 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
I can't speak for anyone else but it looks to me as a
realistic way to have it.
You can also donate to Adam for http://dpldocs.info/, it has
interesting things like cross-package search (search ALL of
code.dlang.or
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 18:10:50 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
A related issue is projects that have dependencies outside of D
itself
- for instance, a project that wraps GTK or Qt or something C
or C++ library
[...]
These problems aren't necessarily insurmountable, but they do
compl
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 00:49:36 UTC, Everlast wrote:
Really, D wins on very few metrics but the D fanboys will only
focus on those.
If D wants to survive it better get people willing to help it,
making their lives more difficult when there are far better
options out there will only
Hi all,
Mathias LANG and me have been working on fixing a regression in
Dub's variable expansion implementation [1]. Background:
In order to support use cases where a variable is used as a
prefix or suffix in an identifier-like strings (e.g.
build/${DUB_PACKAGE}_${DUB_PLATFORM}_${DUB_ARCH}),
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 01:12:30 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
While for the most part it still works very well, however when
porting Mago I found a few functions that are not present in
C99 (most notably wcsncpy_s).
While I can write my own functions to do the same (already done
this w
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 04:37:48 UTC, Josphe Brigmo wrote:
If git would automatically do the dates
It does.
To get changes for a whole file:
git log filename
To get changes for part of a file:
git log -L startLine,endLine filename
There are formatting options for git log to pare
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 09:01:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Let's face it, the term "assert" has been poisoned by decades
of ambiguity.
There is really no ambiguity... The terminology is widespread
and well understood across the field I think.
Ahh, I so, so wish what you said w
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 09:55:19 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 04:32:32 UTC, Jonathan Marler
- The .d extension is not implied, like for dmd/rdmd
I haven't come up with any reasons to support this. Maybe you
can enlighten me?
"rund prog" is shorter an
On 09/09/2018 12:32 AM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 03:33:49 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
- No --main, though that can probably be substituted with -main
Yeah, I don't see any reason to duplicate the flag already supported by
dmd. Maybe there's a reason I'm not aw
On 9/8/18 8:36 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Sent this when I was on a plane, and for some reason it posted with the
timestamp when I hit "send later", not when I connected just now. So
this is to bring the previous message back to the forefront.
-Steve
On 8/9/18 2:44 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/8/2018 2:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Here's where I'm struggling -- because a string provides indexing,
slicing, length, etc. but Phobos ignores that. I can't make a new type
that does the same thing. Not only that, but I'm finding the
specia
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 06:32:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
What would you expect that to tell you? ddoc doesn't require
any kind of doc folder (though some projects would have one for
custom ddoc files that then affect how the documentation
looks), and usually, the best way to handle
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 06:32:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 8:36:26 PM MDT void via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 01:30:14 UTC, Neia Neutuladh
wrote:
> On Sunday, 9 September 2018 at 00:20:04 UTC, void wrote:
>> [...]
>
> https://cod
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 05:44:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
To me, this strongly suggests the following idea:
- add *all* dlang.org packages to our current autotester / CI
infrastructure.
- if a particular (version of a) package builds successfully,
log the
compiler version / git hash
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 01:27:20AM +, Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 05:44:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > To me, this strongly suggests the following idea:
> > - add *all* dlang.org packages to our current autotester / CI
> > infrastructure.
> > -
On Saturday, 8 September 2018 at 15:36:25 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 8/9/18 2:44 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/8/2018 2:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Here's where I'm struggling -- because a string provides
indexing, slicing, length, etc. but Phobos ignores that. I
can't make a n
26 matches
Mail list logo