On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:42:03 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
struct M {
int i;
S*[100] s;
}
struct S {
M* mp;
bool x;
}
S* add(A...)() {
alias m = A[0];
__gshared s = S(,A[1..$]);
m.s[m.i++] =
return
}
void main(){
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19152
--- Comment #3 from Mike Franklin ---
Attempted fix: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8553
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19152
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 |All
OS|Windows
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19152
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19152
--- Comment #2 from Mike Franklin ---
Further reduction to something that will compile successfully when the bug is
fixed.
class TBasicAction
{
int OnExecute()
{
auto name = __traits(getOverloads, this, "OnExecute").stringof;
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
--- Comment #3 from Yuxuan Shui ---
I found the actual bug in codegen. In elfobj.c data_start(), when a symbol
doesn't have a explicit alignment (Salignment <= 0), the symbol itself is
aligned, but its section's alignment is not updated.
To
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19152
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
Yuxuan Shui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P1
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
Yuxuan Shui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
Yuxuan Shui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Severity|enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
Yuxuan Shui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ldc compiled with dmd and |Alignment of section does
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 20:02:41 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 7:15:58 AM MDT aliak via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
It's failing, because you got the condition backwards. __ctfe
is true during CTFE and false during runtime. Your code has
if(__ctfe)
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:02:47 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:42:45 UTC, Domain wrote:
I just give it a try in visual studio code, but I got errors:
[Error - 20:39:54] Starting client failed
Error: Unsupported server configuration {
"command": ""
}
On 09.08.2018 05:02, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community Review for
DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/8274b0f600075e4553b41c31f4b77be2d917bb40/DIPs/DIP1017.md
All review-related feedback on and discussion of the DIP
I already posted this in the vibe.d forums
(https://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/thread/58891/), but it seems, there is not a lot of activity over there, so I am cross posting this here:
Is there a way to find out, if we are currently in a webinterface
request?
My
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 7:15:58 AM MDT aliak via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:01:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 9, 2018 2:37:49 AM MDT aliak via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 23:47:22 UTC,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19152
Issue ID: 19152
Summary: 2.081.1 Regression compiler bug
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority:
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 21:01:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Not trying to give too much away about the library I'm writing,
but the problem I'm trying to solve is parsing out tokens from
a buffer. I want to delineate the whole, as well as the parts,
but it's difficult to get back
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:42:45 UTC, Domain wrote:
I just give it a try in visual studio code, but I got errors:
[Error - 20:39:54] Starting client failed
Error: Unsupported server configuration {
"command": ""
}
at _getServerWorkingDir.then.serverWorkingDir
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 20:54:13 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
SumType is a generic sum type for modern D. It is meant as an
alternative to `std.variant.Algebraic`.
Version 0.5.2, with fixes for the bugs reported in this thread,
is now available. Thanks to vit for their detailed feedback!
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:37:36 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 04:10:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
The DIP makes the claim that:
* "[@noreturn] has the awkward result of a function
specifying it has a return type T, but never returns that
type". When it is
A better name for this type is `never`, which is the name of the
TypeScript type with similar semantics.
https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/basic-types.html#never `nothing` is also a decent name, used in some other languages, but `never` makes it more obvious that a function never
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 07:52:12 UTC, vit wrote:
SumType without initialization doesn't fail if first type has
@disabled this().
It did fail for me, but it also failed *with* initialization too,
so there was definitely a bug there.
method toString is not template. (why is there in the
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:45:54 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that
is not consistent with the rest of the language. Why not
Bottom?
according to the DIP, the name can be chosen arbitrarily as the
type is retrieved via matching the
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:56:05 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
perhaps this should actually be an attribute `@bottom`, or more
a documenting: `@noreturn`?
Yes, it should.
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:47:37 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
There is no explanation of when the additional optimizations
would be actually relevant,
Usually functions that don't return abort the program anyway.
Maybe total code size.
OT: as for microoptimizations, what bugged me is a
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:50:00 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:30:38 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I searched around, and there seems to be no way to specify
alignment on symbol, so I don't think the linker is in the
wrong here.
The alignment should be specified for
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:42:57 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that is
not
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:30:38 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I searched around, and there seems to be no way to specify
alignment on symbol, so I don't think the linker is in the
wrong here.
The alignment should be specified for section.
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:42:57 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that is
not
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
I hope there is a better name than Tbottom. A name like that is
not consistent with the rest of the language. Why not Bottom?
struct M {
int i;
S*[100] s;
}
struct S {
M* mp;
bool x;
}
S* add(A...)() {
alias m = A[0];
__gshared s = S(,A[1..$]);
m.s[m.i++] =
return
}
void main(){
__gshared M m = M(0);
__gshared S s = S(, false);
Clarifications:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 13:30:38 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I'm trying to build LDC with dmd and Musl, but the result ldc
will always crash. I track that down to an unalignment SIMD
access to a global variable. Apparently C++ compiler thinks the
variable should be aligned
I'm trying to build LDC with dmd and Musl, but the result ldc
will always crash. I track that down to an unalignment SIMD
access to a global variable. Apparently C++ compiler thinks the
variable should be aligned to 16 bytes, but it's only aligned to
8 bytes.
After some more digging, I find
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:01:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 2:37:49 AM MDT aliak via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 23:47:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 3:54:34 PM MDT aliak via
>
>
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 12:42:45 UTC, Domain wrote:
I just give it a try in visual studio code, but I got errors:
[Error - 20:39:54] Starting client failed
Error: Unsupported server configuration {
"command": ""
}
at _getServerWorkingDir.then.serverWorkingDir
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
[...]
How does this DIP interact with constructors and deconstructors
as they are glorified void functions?
-Alexander
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 11:48:55 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:37:32 UTC, IM wrote:
I've always had issues with Code-d! I filed several issues on
its GitHub repo, but my experience with the Code-d author was
that those issues are likely to remain open and
On Thursday, August 9, 2018 2:37:49 AM MDT aliak via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 23:47:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 3:54:34 PM MDT aliak via
> >
> > Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> >> I'm trying to debug stuff, so I want to add
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:37:32 UTC, IM wrote:
I've always had issues with Code-d! I filed several issues on
its GitHub repo, but my experience with the Code-d author was
that those issues are likely to remain open and unaddressed.
Since he is a student (or at least he was some time
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19108
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 10:47:37 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Regarding the rationale:
It should be pointed out that this is a further complication of
the type-system (which is already more complex than what c++
has).
That does impact generic code.
My own experience with generic code has
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 03:02:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
This is the feedback thread for the first round of Community
Review for DIP 1017, "Add Bottom Type":
[ ... ]
Regarding the rationale:
It should be pointed out that this is a further complication of
the type-system (which is
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 04:16:45 UTC, Uknown wrote:
I would like to point out that C++ does this with attributes
instead[0]. If this was an attribute instead (like
`@noreturn`), it would simplify interfacing with C++. It would
also avoid the breaking change.
[0]:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 04:10:47 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
The DIP makes the claim that:
* "[@noreturn] has the awkward result of a function specifying
it has a return type T, but never returns that type". When it
is deliberate (such as annotating a fatal error function) the
is
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 20:56:51 UTC, tide wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 07:57:49 UTC, Laurent Tréguier
wrote:
[...]
Code-d overcomplicates things I find though. I can't even build
it, there's so many dependencies attached to it that it isn't
worth looking through to even
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
--- Comment #2 from Yuxuan Shui ---
Looks like dmd mis-aligned a __gshared variable. .alignof reports an alignment
of 16 bytes, while the variable is aligned only to 8 bytes.
--
On Monday, 6 August 2018 at 00:47:12 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Sure https://github.com/thewilsonator/jupyterd
The echo interpreter now works, and the dmd one is there. I've
got no idea if it works because I'm on OSX (yay no shared library
support) if someone wants to test it that would be
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 23:47:22 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 3:54:34 PM MDT aliak via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm trying to debug stuff, so I want to add verbose logging
struct S(T) {
this() {
writeln("created S(T) with properties and ID");
}
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 07:25:57 UTC, Tab wrote:
I find DLS [1] to be very stable, updated more often [2], and
it just works without issues (vs. Code-d) ~~ at least for me.
I think we should give it a chance.
I agree.
I created a long list of features [3] I'd like to see in D IDE.
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 01:04:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 00:11:22 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 00:07:05 UTC, Seb wrote:
(It uses the version from DUB and updates itself once daily,
but somehow dub still lists 0.4.1 at the moment)
It looks
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19151
Issue ID: 19151
Summary: std.utf.toUTF16z() can not be used for LPWSTR
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 01:04:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
...
@safe opAssign can call @system postblit:
bool moved = false;
struct S{
this(this)@system{
moved = true;
}
}
void main()@safe{
auto st = SumType!(S).init;
st = S.init;
assert(moved == true);
}
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 01:04:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 00:11:22 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2018 at 00:07:05 UTC, Seb wrote:
(It uses the version from DUB and updates itself once daily,
but somehow dub still lists 0.4.1 at the moment)
It looks
On Wednesday, 8 August 2018 at 20:56:51 UTC, tide wrote:
DLS took no time at all to build, nice and simple.
The only thing built is a small bootstrap program that downloads
a prebuilt binary release, that's why it's fast. Before v0.5.0,
DLS was always compiled, and that took some time, as
On 8/8/2018 2:01 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Here's where I'm struggling -- because a string provides indexing, slicing,
length, etc. but Phobos ignores that. I can't make a new type that does the same
thing. Not only that, but I'm finding the specializations of algorithms only
work on the
56 matches
Mail list logo
