On Sunday, 16 April 2017 at 08:44:07 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
When anyone mentions the Compiler Shootout for the last 10
years, Isaac always pops up and says he won't put it on his
site. I wish he'd just go away.
I wish the D community would stop using the benchmarks game as an
excuse.
On Sunday, 16 April 2017 at 04:19:56 UTC, Joakim wrote:
came out tops if I weighted time, memory, and source code size
equally. Not always highest, as Free Pascal would sometimes
beat it, but D usually won.
You juggled the numbers to get a result ;-)
This one doesn't show any benchmarks
On Thursday, 13 April 2017 at 03:29:26 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Cooperative with what? He chose not to include D anymore,
which at one point dominated the shootout, and says we should
just start our own site:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/no8klt$1d1i$1...@digitalmars.com
When did D dominate?
On Thursday, 4 August 2016 at 20:15:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
but the measurement code is available for others to use
It's down to you --
"If you're interested in something not shown on the benchmarks
game website then please take the program source code and the
measurement scripts and
On Monday, 8 August 2016 at 17:11:54 UTC, Meta wrote:
Despite the fact that comparing benchmarks across languages
tells you very little about how "fast" that language is …
Doing so would at-least offer something for people to consider.
On Monday, 8 August 2016 at 00:44:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/7/2016 10:53 AM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
Rather than only being dismissive,
How did you get from
Yeah, I wouldn't bother with it, either.
to
If you've changed your mind about putting D back on the site,
we'd be happy to help.
On Monday, 8 August 2016 at 00:15:09 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I think he's referring to a HPC cluster running chapel vs. C++
versions of programs.
Let's not speculate about Russel Winder's comment.
The advantage to Chapel is its simplicity and expressiveness.
That does seem to be the selling
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 21:19:54 UTC, qznc wrote:
Comparing so many languages is too broad. We need more specific
benchmarks which must be looked at in more detail.
"Chapel programs versus C++ g++" just compares 2.
Where are those "more specific benchmarks" ?
If you want to answer the
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 05:04:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Ultimately, my opinion is that the benchmark is outdated and
not useful today. I
ignore it, if anybody cites the benchmark game for performance
measurements.
Yeah, I wouldn't bother with it, either.
Rather than only being
On Sunday, 7 August 2016 at 13:30:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
In the end a bit of X10 or Chapel code running on a Blue Gene
ro Cray is going to annihilate any code written in Fortran,
FORTRAN, C++, C, or any other language for performance.
On Friday, 5 August 2016 at 05:22:07 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
...
It seems that this one has a more active community around it...
?
https://alioth.debian.org/activity/?group_id=100815
;-)
On Thursday, 4 August 2016 at 20:15:35 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
but the measurement code is available for others to use:
Someone had those benchmarks game measurement scripts working
with D - a couple of years ago - but then … ?
https://forum.dlang.org/post/lvajbi$1477$1...@digitalmars.com
On Tuesday, 8 September 2015 at 21:06:26 UTC, qznc wrote:
Afaik the Erlang runtime does not interrupt processes.
Depends what you mean by "processes" :-)
In this comparison it is actually interesting, because D has
its own bignum implementation in the standard library.
There you go!
On
On Tuesday, 8 September 2015 at 09:27:13 UTC, qznc wrote:
For example, threadring measures context switching.
thread-ring has aged badly. It was added when the measurements
were only made on single-core hardware, and Erlang's huge number
of lightweight processes seemed interesting ;-)
On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 12:05:18 UTC, qznc wrote:
I started something on my own.
Kudos to qznc!
The C/C++ programs were selected quite randomly.
Note: There are separate C and C++ programs shown on the
benchmarks game -- so for something like regex-dna there's a C
program using
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 08:59:57 UTC, ixid wrote:
-snip-
People love competitions, the current benchmark site that seems
to weirdly dislike D is one of people's go to references. I do
not have the ability to do this but it would seem like an
excellent project for someone outside the major
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 15:36:42 UTC, ixid wrote:
-snip-
Yes, it requires someone to pick up the baton for what is
clearly a very significant task. Your site is excellent and
it's very unfortunate that D is absent.
iirc I asked Peter Alexander about progress last December and he
had
On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 02:20:24 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
not evaluated by the Computer Language Benchmarks Game any more.
iirc Some people in the D community were going to make their own
measurements of benchmarks game tasks and publish them. Has that
happened?
I just noticed someone
On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 18:30:37 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
-snip-
On a somewhat related note, I've been working on a CI system to
keep tabs on the compile-time/run-time performance, memory
usage and file size for our compilers.
Maybe you've seen Emery Berger's work on
On Thursday, 18 September 2014 at 00:59:41 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
-snip-
Off-topic question: I've been wondering, how do you magically
appear here every time the Shootout is mentioned?
Google magic.
The project was renamed 6 years ago, it's the benchmarks game.
Google shootout and
On Tuesday, 16 September 2014 at 21:04:59 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
-snip-
I'll take a stab at it. Will give me something to do on my
commute :-) (assuming his scripts work, or can be made to work
on OS X).
It'll be interesting to see which linux stuff is missing:
-- without libgtop2 you
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 20:09:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
# unbelievable we're still missing in the programming language
shootout
http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/
D is one of the 30 or so language implementations not measured on
Q6600 that were measured on Pentium 4 before
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 23:56:23 UTC, bearophile wrote:
-snip-
By now - if they had actually made measurements, and published
and promoted them - their website would be highly ranked.
This is probably false, for two or more reasons.
It's so much less-effort to assume failure than to
On Tuesday, 16 September 2014 at 02:20:18 UTC, Freddy wrote:
What The D community do wrong in the first place?
Nothing. There are just too many language implementations. It
takes more time than I choose to donate. Been there; done that.
On Tuesday, 16 September 2014 at 03:53:10 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
I am in the progress of building a benchmarking suite
…
But don't expect fast progress. ;-)
Well, for faster progress, someone could just take the Python
scripts from the benchmarks game, measure programs and figure out
how
25 matches
Mail list logo
