Re: Mixin function names
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 21:29:05 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 18.07.2017 23:28, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 21:22:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 18.07.2017 22:57, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like
this:
template strFunc(string s){
int mixin(s)(int a){
return a+1;
}
}
...
No.
If not, is something like this being looked at?
The suggestion has been made, but there was no extensive
discussion so far.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md#mixin-identifiers
That's the DIP for static foreach. Is there a separate DIP for
mixin identifiers?
Not yet.
:( I might look into making one, then. This feature would scratch
a rather sizable itch.
Re: Mixin function names
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 21:22:47 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 18.07.2017 22:57, Moinak Bhattacharrya wrote:
Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:
template strFunc(string s){
int mixin(s)(int a){
return a+1;
}
}
...
No.
If not, is something like this being looked at?
The suggestion has been made, but there was no extensive
discussion so far.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md#mixin-identifiers
That's the DIP for static foreach. Is there a separate DIP for
mixin identifiers?
Re: Mixin function names
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 20:57:51 UTC, Moinak Bhattacharrya
wrote:
Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:
template strFunc(string s){
int mixin(s)(int a){
return a+1;
}
}
If not, is something like this being looked at?
Or, just something like this for any variable name.
Mixin function names
Is it possible to mixin function names? IE something like this:
template strFunc(string s){
int mixin(s)(int a){
return a+1;
}
}
If not, is something like this being looked at?
