On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:14:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2018 16:34:11 Guillaume Piolat via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:24:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 07, 2018 12:53:16 Guillaume Piolat via
>
> Digitalmars-d wr
So i've seen on the forum over the years arguments about
auto-decoding (mostly) and some other things. Things that have
been considered mistakes, and cannot be corrected because of the
breaking changes it would create. And I always wonder why not
make a solution to the tune of a flag that makes
On Monday, 19 June 2017 at 20:01:01 UTC, Dan Walmsley wrote:
On Friday, 8 April 2016 at 03:38:01 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
So, for me one of the greatest things about d is that it is
compiled to machine language. But It makes me sad that this
strength doesn't seem to be available in one of
In the past I have worked with D, C#, Java, Python and C and some
other less popular languages. Most recently working with C# I
suddenly realize the convenience and flexibility I had in D. One
case in particular is with bit-fields in D they are a pleasure to
use and implement, but in C# they ar
So, for me one of the greatest things about d is that it is
compiled to machine language. But It makes me sad that this
strength doesn't seem to be available in one of the most obvious
places.
There are some projects:
minilibd:
https://bitbucket.org/timosi/minlibd
The example code is still wa
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 14:15:18 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
On Saturday, 26 March 2016 at 07:53:06 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
Found a simple way to call .NET managed code from un-managed D
code. I didn't know about it so I thought someone else could
find it useful.
https://github.com/
Found a simple way to call .NET managed code from un-managed D
code. I didn't know about it so I thought someone else could find
it useful.
https://github.com/taylorh140/Calling-NET-from-D
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 20:09:05 UTC, Timo Sintonen wrote:
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 19:00:32 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
Maybe I am wrong, But I believe that the low level community
is awaiting the release of GDC/LDC compatible with 2.067 DMD
front end. This will allow for volati
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 10:14:17 UTC, Timo Sintonen wrote:
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 08:49:57 UTC, Andrey wrote:
On Monday, 9 November 2015 at 08:35:01 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
https://github.com/JinShil/D_Runtime_ARM_Cortex-M_study like
this?
Yes. But I mean the real supported library,
So I have played with a few GUI libraries with bindings available
through D. Personally I find that it seems like there is alot of
effort being put forth on GUI projects.
It is my experience that most project's fail or die, not because
of lack of effort but lack of specification, many people s
On Tuesday, 3 March 2015 at 18:43:50 UTC, Aram wrote:
Hi all
I've been thinking over a GUI framework for D for some time,
and ended up with idea expressed by Andrew Fedoniouk here:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/32633.html.
That is, having a separate drawing layer, and wi
On Tuesday, 3 March 2015 at 10:37:49 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 at 17:06:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 19:49:37 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
I just think its a shame that all over the place people are
compiling code in different programming langua
On Sunday, 1 March 2015 at 13:13:58 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Jacob Carlborg:
@arc class Foo
{
T1 opAddRef();
T2 opRelease();
}
...
Alternative A gives a clear documentation it's a reference
counted class without having to scan the methods.
Assuming you want something like DIP74, this des
On Monday, 2 March 2015 at 01:22:58 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:40:28 +, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
But still the question was about smaller executable when
compiling d
code. The linker needs to know which .o files to include, the
pascal
notation is basically:
uses
thisBigo
On Sunday, 1 March 2015 at 21:39:08 UTC, Mike James wrote:
On Sunday, 1 March 2015 at 20:41:30 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
So I was using the Lazarus IDE the other day, and i thought to
myself, what if i create an application with only a button in
it. well it was easy enough to do. but behold
So I was using the Lazarus IDE the other day, and i thought to
myself, what if i create an application with only a button in it.
well it was easy enough to do. but behold I saw the executable
and it was 14 MB, and I said 'well damn.' It seems to me that
pascal does not do lazy inclusion when it
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 21:15:10 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 2015-02-27 20:49, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
>I just think its a shame that all over the place people are
>compiling
>code in different programming
On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 07:26:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-02-26 20:53, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
So, In languages like .net they have dll's that contain not
only
bytecode but also the necessary headers to make them usable in
any .net
language. I was curious if this kind of thing
On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 21:37:46 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 26 February 2015 at 19:53:54 UTC, Taylor
Hillegeist wrote:
So, In languages like .net they have dll's that contain not
only bytecode but also the necessary headers to make them
usable in any .net language. I was curi
So, In languages like .net they have dll's that contain not only
bytecode but also the necessary headers to make them usable in
any .net language. I was curious if this kind of thing has ever
been attempted for static libraries?
basically some type of universal header + static library =
Every
20 matches
Mail list logo
