On 11/07/2016 02:00 AM, Danni Coy via Digitalmars-d wrote:
When I mean high quality I mean competitive with Qt (the current least bad
cross platform toolkit), DLangUI gets compared to the Java UI offerings
which leaves me somewhat cold. I have never met a java program with a UI I
liked.
Yea.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Joakim via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 October 2016 at 22:38:07 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
>
>> The bit that sends group 3 people off screaming is static typing, once
>> you have accepted the need to explicitly type everything
On Saturday, 29 October 2016 at 22:38:07 UTC, Danni Coy wrote:
The bit that sends group 3 people off screaming is static
typing, once you have accepted the need to explicitly type
everything then Template functions are pretty straight forward
in D.
D can probably do well with groups 1 and
Those categories - I am not sure how well they fit.
When I learnt to program, C was considered a high level language,
and now Swift is considered low level. The world has changed a
little, but that isn't my main point.
To grow in a healthy way, D doesn't need to think in terms of
I am going to talk as a person who mostly works with group 3 languages
but will use whatever they need to use to get the job done (tm).
> The reason for the split is that there are different levels of software
> expertise and performance needs, and each of those groups is geared for a
> different
On Thursday, 27 October 2016 at 17:03:09 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Joakim wrote:
1. low-level compiled languages like C++, D, Rust, and Swift,
meant for
performance and usually experts who want to squeeze it out
2. mid-level bytecode languages like Java and C#,
On 10/27/2016 02:22 AM, Joakim wrote:
1. low-level compiled languages like C++, D, Rust, and Swift, meant for
performance and usually experts who want to squeeze it out
2. mid-level bytecode languages like Java and C#, meant for the vast
middle of day-to-day programmers to crank out libraries
On Thursday, 27 October 2016 at 06:22:03 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I noticed that Richard Gabriel, one of the designers of Common
Lisp, is on the committee for the new conference
that Andrei mentioned here, so I went back and checked out his
website again: http://dreamsongs.com. I mentioned his
I noticed that Richard Gabriel, one of the designers of Common
Lisp, is on the committee for the new conference
that Andrei mentioned here, so I went back and checked out his
website again: http://dreamsongs.com. I mentioned his famous
"Worse is better" essay here a couple years ago:
