I doubt bounties are effective as a motivation for this kind of
thing.
If so couldn't you make your code public?
On 28 June 2014 15:21, Nordlöw digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I doubt bounties are effective as a motivation for this kind of thing.
If so couldn't you make your code public?
I doubt there is any code to be made public that isn't already. :)
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 14:21:03 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I doubt bounties are effective as a motivation for this kind
of thing.
If so couldn't you make your code public?
Don does not have any code that actually fixes that issue. He as
done a lot of job on CTFE refactoring and unification
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 21:20:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 17:52:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On 6/26/2014 7:02 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
I've increased the bounty on this bug. Fast CTFE is very
important.
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 09:42:22 UTC, Don wrote:
Yes, of course I'm not interested in bounties. But note that
that issue is not really a bug, it's a project.
I put hundreds of hours of work into this, to get to the point
where we are now - fixing the compiler structure to the point
where
On 27 June 2014 10:42, Don via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I doubt bounties are effective as a motivation for this kind of thing.
+1
That's a pretty big bounty though. I bet it would be motivating for
the jobless. :P
On 6/27/14, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 27 June 2014 10:42, Don via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I doubt bounties are effective as a motivation for
On 2014-06-27 5:53 AM, safety0ff wrote:
Perhaps the bounty won't stimulate anybody who doesn't have other
motivations to improve the situation, but more information about the
scope of the issue would be helpful to both backers and potential
claimants.
From what I've seen writing an ASN.1
On 6/27/14, 8:54 AM, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
That's a pretty big bounty though. I bet it would be motivating for
the jobless. :P
On 6/27/14, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On 27 June 2014 10:42, Don via Digitalmars-d
I've increased the bounty on this bug. Fast CTFE is very important.
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325927-ctfe-copy-on-write-is-slow-and-causes-huge-memory-usage
-Shammah
On 6/26/2014 7:02 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
I've increased the bounty on this bug. Fast CTFE is very important.
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325927-ctfe-copy-on-write-is-slow-and-causes-huge-memory-usage
This is great news, and I'm sure very much appreciated by all.
I can't
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 10:52 AM
From: Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
To: digitalmars-d@puremagic.com
Subject: Re: Bounty Increase on Issue #1325927
On 6/26/2014 7:02 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
I've increased the bounty on this bug. Fast CTFE
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 17:52:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 6/26/2014 7:02 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
I've increased the bounty on this bug. Fast CTFE is very
important.
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325927-ctfe-copy-on-write-is-slow-and-causes-huge-memory-usage
This
13 matches
Mail list logo
