On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 at 23:27:22 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 8/23/2017 3:58 PM, Mark via Digitalmars-d wrote:
This kind of criticism comes up fairly often in the forums,
maybe once every few weeks. I can link to the recent threads
on the matter, but I'm sure you can make an
On Wednesday, 23 August 2017 at 18:20:19 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Weka uses D after their CTO Liran's evaluation of a number of
programming languages. Liran explains why he chose D and why he
still thinks D was the right choice in his a couple of DConf
talks.
I worked at Weka for a while
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 16:27:22 Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 8/23/2017 3:58 PM, Mark via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:14:33 UTC, Jonathan Shamir wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> But lets be honest. If I was just interested to learn about this
> >>
On 8/23/2017 3:58 PM, Mark via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:14:33 UTC, Jonathan Shamir wrote:
[...]
But lets be honest. If I was just interested to learn about this
"modern system programming language" that is C++ done right, I would
dismiss D very quickly. We need
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:14:33 UTC, Jonathan Shamir wrote:
[...]
But lets be honest. If I was just interested to learn about
this "modern system programming language" that is C++ done
right, I would dismiss D very quickly. We need to get together
as a community and rethink your
On 08/22/2017 08:24 AM, ixid wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:14:33 UTC, Jonathan Shamir wrote:
various.
Out of interest did you pick up D before or after joining the start up?
If before did you introduce D to them or were they already using it?
Weka uses D after their CTO Liran's
But lets be honest. If I was just interested to learn about
this "modern system programming language" that is C++ done
right, I would dismiss D very quickly. We need to get together
as a community and rethink your priorities, because with
problems like this we're making it very hard for
Am 22.08.2017 um 17:14 schrieb Jonathan Shamir:
The DUB package repository is horrible! More often than not, the
packages are so poorly written I end up just writing my own
implementation. Adding the ability to "rate" packages would go a long
way in improving the situation.
We are working on
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:14:33 UTC, Jonathan Shamir wrote:
The DUB package repository is horrible! More often than not,
the packages are so poorly written I end up just writing my own
implementation. Adding the ability to "rate" packages would go
a long way in improving the situation.
On Tuesday, August 22, 2017 15:14:33 Jonathan Shamir via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> https://dlang.org/htod.html
>
> I click download and get an exe!
>
> And in the bugs section:
> No linux version.
>
> I'll start with the productive part. If anyone can point me out
> to the sources of htod I would
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:48:17 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
Other possibilities can be dstep or cpp2d from visuald project.
Though don't know if the latter can work on linux.
So I guess someone should pick one and put it on the site. And
make sure the source code is available. Having a link to
Other possibilities can be dstep or cpp2d from visuald project.
Though don't know if the latter can work on linux.
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:24:54 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:14:33 UTC, Jonathan Shamir
wrote:
various.
Out of interest did you pick up D before or after joining the
start up? If before did you introduce D to them or were they
already using it?
I work at
On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 at 15:14:33 UTC, Jonathan Shamir wrote:
various.
Out of interest did you pick up D before or after joining the
start up? If before did you introduce D to them or were they
already using it?
https://dlang.org/htod.html
I click download and get an exe!
And in the bugs section:
No linux version.
I'll start with the productive part. If anyone can point me out
to the sources of htod I would love to compile for linux + osx.
Any task seems more attractive to me than manually
15 matches
Mail list logo
