Re: DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-22 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 10:36:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1007 [1], "'future symbol' Compiler Concept", is now underway. From now until 11:59 PM ET on June 21 (3:59 AM GMT on June 22), the community has the opportunity to provide last-minute

Re: DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-07 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
On 6/7/2017 3:36 AM, Mike Parker wrote: The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1007 [1], "'future symbol' Compiler Concept", is now underway. From now until 11:59 PM ET on June 21 (3:59 AM GMT on June 22), the community has the opportunity to provide last-minute feedback. If you missed

Re: DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-07 Thread Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 14:42:24 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: I'll be revising it a bit in the near future based on the lessons I've learned so far to clarify the process, but I want to keep this thread focused on feedback. Thanks! https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/README.md

Re: DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-07 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
On 06/07/2017 10:42 AM, Mike Parker wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 13:47:41 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote: This has probably been said somewhere before, but could you give a short explanation of what the formal review is, and how it's supposed to be different from the preliminary review?

Re: DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-07 Thread Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
On 06/07/2017 09:47 AM, Olivier FAURE wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 10:36:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1007 [1], "'future symbol' Compiler Concept", is now underway. From now until 11:59 PM ET on June 21 (3:59 AM GMT on June 22), the community

Re: DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-07 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 13:47:41 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote: This has probably been said somewhere before, but could you give a short explanation of what the formal review is, and how it's supposed to be different from the preliminary review? Thank you in advance. The basic idea is in

Re: DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-07 Thread Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 10:36:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1007 [1], "'future symbol' Compiler Concept", is now underway. From now until 11:59 PM ET on June 21 (3:59 AM GMT on June 22), the community has the opportunity to provide last-minute

DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review Has Begun

2017-06-07 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
The the formal review for DIP 1007, "'future symbol' Compiler Concept", is now underway. Please provide all feedback in the review thread: http://forum.dlang.org/post/ldjlsobcdevxiitqy...@forum.dlang.org

DIP 1007--"future symbol"--Formal Review

2017-06-07 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
The first stage of the formal review for DIP 1007 [1], "'future symbol' Compiler Concept", is now underway. From now until 11:59 PM ET on June 21 (3:59 AM GMT on June 22), the community has the opportunity to provide last-minute feedback. If you missed the preliminary review [2], this is your