Added some basic implementation
(https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3758), need
some feedback from any DMD hackers who actually know how stuff is
supposed to work :(
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 00:36:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
To be more constructive, naming something by its use will
fatally look very weird and confusing when other uses are
found. And here we see that it is not even implemented but
already have other uses. Can we please avoid that pitfall ?
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 00:26:56 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
I have nothing against it BUT...
The fact that you need this is a proof that
TemplateArgumentList/TemplateArgumentPack have actually use
outside being template argument list and/or pack.
Your just defeated you whole Q/A on DIP54...
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 00:26:56 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
I have nothing against it BUT...
The fact that you need this is a proof that
TemplateArgumentList/TemplateArgumentPack have actually use
outside being template argument list and/or pack.
Your just defeated you whole Q/A on DIP54...
On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 18:32:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP63
This is solution for a problem I am currently having with
implementing http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP54 (afair it was also
mentioned by Timon Gehr during old discussion of that DIP)
New proposed semantics ( to cat
On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 12:37:55 UTC, matovitch wrote:
And why these operators only ?
tl; dr: because I am limiting proposal to what I am actually able
and willing to implement :)
On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 08:56:24 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I guess there's no way around it, but it seems inconsistent
that the operators are defined as templated aliases instead of
functions as anywhere else. Could you add a paragraph to the
DIP which points this out and give a short justific
Well I realized I was a bit off-topic there since it is not about
ctfe operators but raw template operators. I'm out.
On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 08:56:24 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 18:32:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP63
This is solution for a problem I am currently having with
implementing http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP54 (afair it was also
mentioned by Timon Gehr during
On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 18:32:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP63
This is solution for a problem I am currently having with
implementing http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP54 (afair it was also
mentioned by Timon Gehr during old discussion of that DIP)
New proposed semantics ( to cat
On 06/15/2014 08:32 PM, Dicebot wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP63
This is solution for a problem I am currently having with implementing
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP54 (afair it was also mentioned by Timon Gehr
during old discussion of that DIP)
New proposed semantics ( to catch your attention an
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP63
This is solution for a problem I am currently having with
implementing http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP54 (afair it was also
mentioned by Timon Gehr during old discussion of that DIP)
New proposed semantics ( to catch your attention and get to read
the link ;) ):
templ
12 matches
Mail list logo
