On 14-Sep-2015 21:47, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Over in the d.learn forum, somebody posted a question about poor
performance in a text-parsing program. After a bit of profiling I
discovered that reducing GC collection frequency (i.e., GC.disable()
then manually call GC.collect() at
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:26:17AM +0300, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 14-Sep-2015 21:47, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >Over in the d.learn forum, somebody posted a question about poor
> >performance in a text-parsing program. After a bit of profiling I
> >discovered
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:08:01AM +0200, Daniel Kozák via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> http://dlang.org/changelog/2.067.0.html#gc-options
[...]
Wow that is obscure. This really needs to go into the main docs so
that it can actually be found...
T
--
People demand freedom of speech to make up
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.067.0.html#gc-options
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:25:06 -0700
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d" wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:19:53PM +, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]
> > Isn't there some amount of configuration
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 18:51:36 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Over in the d.learn forum, somebody posted a question about poor
performance in a text-parsing program. After a bit of profiling
I
discovered that reducing GC collection frequency (i.e.,
GC.disable()
then manually call
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 18:58:45 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 18:51:36 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
We could also reduce the default collection frequency, of
course, but lacking sufficient data I wouldn't know what value
to set it to.
Definitely. I think it
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 07:19:53PM +, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[...]
> Isn't there some amount of configuration that can currently be done
> via environment variables? Or was that just something that someone had
> done in one of the GC-related dconf talks that never made it
Over in the d.learn forum, somebody posted a question about poor
performance in a text-parsing program. After a bit of profiling I
discovered that reducing GC collection frequency (i.e., GC.disable()
then manually call GC.collect() at some interval) improved program
performance by about 20%.
This
On Monday, 14 September 2015 at 18:51:36 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
We could also reduce the default collection frequency, of
course, but lacking sufficient data I wouldn't know what value
to set it to.
Definitely. I think it hits a case where it is right at the edge
of the line and you are