On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 05:43:36 UTC, Ali wrote:
Link to said article please.
i think he means this article
https://www.excelsiorjet.com/blog/articles/conservative-gc-is-it-really-that-bad/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16436574
Oops my mistake
Yes, thanks it is exactly this
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 05:43:36 UTC, Ali wrote:
i think he means this article
https://www.excelsiorjet.com/blog/articles/conservative-gc-is-it-really-that-bad/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16436574
Thank you.
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:53:49 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:42:48 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:42:48 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
later the absence of knowledge about the liveness of local
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 02:42:48 UTC, Nikolay wrote:
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
later the absence of knowledge about the liveness of local
These guys have independent JVM implementation and used
Conservative GC for many years. As I can see it it is very
similar to d-runtime GC. But their conclusion is: "sooner or
later the absence of knowledge about the liveness of local
variables will lead to problems in production that just
