On 02/07/2017 04:28 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 4 February 2017 at 23:54:12 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
That's obviously a self important lookup.
This. So much this.
I'm afraid you are the only one who appreciate my humor :)
"self-important" is official now:
On Saturday, 4 February 2017 at 23:54:12 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
That's obviously a self important lookup.
This. So much this.
I'm afraid you are the only one who appreciate my humor :)
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 11:03:32 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/6/2017 12:45 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
But is this really worth an article?
It's ideally suited for an article. It's easy to grasp, and
enables a very interesting idiom.
I personally think the idiom is neato
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 09:39:25 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 09:00:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 08:45:45 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
But is this really worth an article?
IMO, as something targeted at non-D
On 2/6/2017 12:45 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote:
But is this really worth an article?
It's ideally suited for an article. It's easy to grasp, and enables a very
interesting idiom.
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 09:00:43 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 08:45:45 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
But is this really worth an article?
IMO, as something targeted at non-D users, yes.
Oh yeah? For bragging about how D uses modules and doesn't need
On Monday, 6 February 2017 at 08:45:45 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
But is this really worth an article?
IMO, as something targeted at non-D users, yes. A brief overview
of D's module system, a description of the problem & how the DIP
was brought up to address it, how the DIP was
imports.
Any thoughts?
I like it!
Wow. This is... brilliant. Thanks for the great idea. I ran a
few tests and it
seems to be doing out of the box most of what we want with
DIP1005 with no
language change at all.
Congratulations!
I agree, it's pretty dazz! We need to give this technique
On Saturday, 4 February 2017 at 14:57:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/3/17 6:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Daniel, Dominikus: please consider writing an article about
this.
That would be indeed very very useful. -- Andrei
Okay, I will. However I currently have some obligations which
On 2/3/17 5:00 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 23:33:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree, it's pretty dazz! We need to give this technique a memorable
name (not an acronym). I thought "Voldemort Types" turned out rather
well, whereas CTFE is klunky, UFCS is
On 2/3/17 6:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Daniel, Dominikus: please consider writing an article about this.
That would be indeed very very useful. -- Andrei
On 2/3/17 6:50 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/03/2017 03:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/3/17 10:41 AM, Daniel N wrote:
auto fun_time(imp!"std.datetime".SysTime tm)
We need to give this technique a memorable name (not an acronym).
If it's going to stay "imp" (whi
On 02/03/2017 06:50 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
"the imp idiom" might do but imps have a very
insignificant appearance in Harry Potter.
But they have much significance in Doom :)
...part of which takes place on Phobos ;)
On Friday, 3 February 2017 at 23:33:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree, it's pretty dazz! We need to give this technique a
memorable name (not an acronym). I thought "Voldemort Types"
turned out rather well, whereas CTFE is klunky, UFCS is even
worse. The absolute worst is C++ SFI
On 02/03/2017 03:33 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 2/3/17 10:41 AM, Daniel N wrote:
>>> auto fun_time(imp!"std.datetime".SysTime tm)
> We need to give this technique a memorable name (not an acronym).
If it's going to stay "imp" (which I initial
s and it
seems to be doing out of the box most of what we want with DIP1005 with no
language change at all.
Congratulations!
I agree, it's pretty dazz! We need to give this technique a memorable name (not
an acronym). I thought "Voldemort Types" turned out rather well, whe
16 matches
Mail list logo
