On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 00:45:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/5/15 4:08 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Just use code.dlang.org. It's perfect either as a place for
good work and a stepping stone toward the standard library.
Andrei
I get the feeling you guys will eventually look bac
Perhaps it is over ambitious to start with the goal of producing
only code destined to end up in Phobos. The domain is so broadly
defined, and the standard to aspire to so high that one ends up
setting the goalpost so high that given likely contributors one
risks ending up running out of steam
On 2/5/15 4:08 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 23:35:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
No, you get it wrong. This is decided exclusively community voting.
Andrei or Walter can veto something that they don't want but their
explicit approval is not required.
I'm surprised. From m
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 23:35:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 18:23:19 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
1) All Phobos proposals must go through
std.experimental.logger
2) It must implement something generally desired in Phobos
3) Implementation is supposed to be at lea
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 19:05:10 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
1) All Phobos proposals must go through std.experimental.logger
When you say I put the current process wrongly, you mean there
is no way to submit a new module avoiding a std.experimental
namespace?
Yes, right now this is the idea
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 22:04:04 UTC, Jeremy Powers wrote:
Snipped a bit, tl;dr is you should use dub.
I use it but with no success in the matter of the proposal.
How could you be sure that after long lonely work the proposal
is worth
inclusion?
..
If it's worth inclusion in phob
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 18:23:19 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
1) All Phobos proposals must go through std.experimental.logger
2) It must implement something generally desired in Phobos
3) Implementation is supposed to be at least stable enough to
not undergo a full rewrite after inclusion
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 23:04:03 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
If it's worth inclusion in phobos, it will rise to the top.
I admire idealists, but in the past few years how many
independent projects have been adopted by phobos? Is it the
case that none of those that were not are essentia
Hi Dicebot.
You are a clear thinker - close reasoning - and I admire that.
As you may see requirements are very lax. Only real difference
is that your proposal allows to accept modules that are not
supposed to ever go to Phobos at all - which I am still
convinced is a bad thing and belongs to
How could you be sure that after long lonely work the proposal
is worth
inclusion?
No need to be lonely. You can (and should) have community
projects on
dub. The dub repository is a distribution mechanism, if you
want community
contribution to a library advertise as such and git er done.
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 22:25:28 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
There is no contradiction between distributing the latest
version of 'Mars' with DMD releases (including the library
update tool) and having more frequent releases in between, if
that is thought to be the right thing to do.
Sm
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 22:08:42 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 21:21:22 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 18:44:06 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
clip
You know, I don't even like the use of voting when it comes to
important decisions whic
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 22:10:35 UTC, Israel wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 05:51:18 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 04:37:21 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
What could be great is if DMD supported something like JAR
packages, and could look for modules inside of them. S
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Israel via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 05:51:18 UTC, tcak wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 04:37:21 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
>> What could be great is if DMD supported something like JAR packages, an
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 05:51:18 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 04:37:21 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
What could be great is if DMD supported something like JAR
packages, and could look for modules inside of them. So, all
experimental codes would be packed daily in a zip fil
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 21:21:22 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 18:44:06 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
clip
You know, I don't even like the use of voting when it comes to
important decisions which last forever. I have no mechanism for
determining fairly who has th
Snipped a bit, tl;dr is you should use dub.
How could you be sure that after long lonely work the proposal is worth
> inclusion?
>
No need to be lonely. You can (and should) have community projects on
dub. The dub repository is a distribution mechanism, if you want community
contribution to a
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 18:44:06 UTC, CraigDillabaugh
wrote:
1) All Phobos proposals must go through
std.experimental.logger
2) It must implement something generally desired in Phobos
3) Implementation is supposed to be at least stable enough to
not undergo a full rewrite after inclusio
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:56:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
You have clearly put a lot of effort in this. That makes me
very uneasy to repeat the same critique as earlier but, sadly,
it still all applies. This proposal tries to fix problems it
doesn't prove exist, doing so with solutions that
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 18:23:19 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:56:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
You have clearly put a lot of effort in this. That makes me
very uneasy to repeat the same critique as earlier but, sadly,
it still all applies. This proposal tries
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 06:56:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
You have clearly put a lot of effort in this. That makes me
very uneasy to repeat the same critique as earlier but, sadly,
it still all applies. This proposal tries to fix problems it
doesn't prove exist, doing so with solutions that
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 23:15:25 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
This looks very similar to std.experimental.
In one way, yes, it is similar to std.experimental, but not that
much as it seems.
More precisely:
1. Take the namespace designed for new module drafting out of the
Phobos
2.
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 06:47:26 +, weaselcat wrote:
> or std.experimental could just be separated into its own repository and
> put on dub?
and make all rdmd users very unhappy, yeah. no, it's not about dub, it's
about "std." prefix.
happy rdmd user.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
You have clearly put a lot of effort in this. That makes me very
uneasy to repeat the same critique as earlier but, sadly, it
still all applies. This proposal tries to fix problems it doesn't
prove exist, doing so with solutions that are not guranteed to
help.
It also wrongly explains current
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 05:51:18 UTC, tcak wrote:
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 04:37:21 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 23:15:25 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
This looks very similar to std.experimental. I originally
thought that the difference between std.expe
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 04:37:21 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 23:15:25 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
This looks very similar to std.experimental. I originally
thought that the difference between std.experimental and this
library was going to be how it was used.
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 23:15:25 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
This looks very similar to std.experimental. I originally
thought that the difference between std.experimental and this
library was going to be how it was used.
std.experimental:
module that may become part of the standa
On Wednesday, 4 February 2015 at 22:10:51 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
Hi,
Abstract:
D Drafting Library is an official library modeled by the D
community and designed to support the development process of
the D Standard Library. The drafting library is coupled with
the standard library and doesn't in
Hi,
Abstract:
D Drafting Library is an official library modeled by the D
community and designed to support the development process of the
D Standard Library. The drafting library is coupled with the
standard library and doesn't introduce any duplicated
functionality. It should be used during
29 matches
Mail list logo
