On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 21:12:06 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/28/2014 06:11 PM, Mason McGill wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 09:15:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I like DIP54 and I think the work on fixing tuples is
awesome, but I
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 16:03:07 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I understand, but I was talking about `var` being referred to as
a `TemplateArgumentList` when it's not used as such. It's used
as
an `ArgumentList`, just not a `TemplateArgumentList`.
Why do you expect template argument list to be
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 16:09:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 16:03:07 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I understand, but I was talking about `var` being referred to
as
a `TemplateArgumentList` when it's not used as such. It's used
as
an `ArgumentList`, just not a
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 20:44:06 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 16:09:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 16:03:07 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I understand, but I was talking about `var` being referred to
as
a `TemplateArgumentList` when it's not used as such.
On Sunday, 29 June 2014 at 21:24:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I am honestly trying to understand people thought flow goes
that makes them expect such things :) That may help to come
with better idea (no currently proposed name is any good)
Quite frankly any name is better than that except tuple.
On 2014-06-26 23:16, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Note that the word tuple in D is used to refer to two very different
things. What you want is essentially an anonymous struct, and should be
adequately covered by std.typecons.tuple.
I would like some form of anonymous struct, with some
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I like DIP54 and I think the work on fixing tuples is awesome,
but I have 1 nit-picky question: why is it called
TemplateArgumentList when it's not always used as template
arguments?
void func(string, string) { }
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 09:15:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I like DIP54 and I think the work on fixing tuples is awesome,
but I have 1 nit-picky question: why is it called
TemplateArgumentList when it's not always used as template
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 09:15:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I like DIP54 and I think the work on fixing tuples is awesome,
but I have 1 nit-picky question: why is it called
TemplateArgumentList when it's not always used as template
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
We'd make a step forward when we stop calling type tuples type
tuples.
They are not tuples, and do not contain (only) types.
I agree, but that's what they're called in the compiler source
code, so
it's kinda hard
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 19:39:35 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
You keep repeating that, but people keep being confused. It is
time to admit defeat.
I don't think any name is possible which don't keep someone
confused - as long as this entity behaves as it does.
'StaticList' is what you may
On 06/28/2014 06:11 PM, Mason McGill wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 09:15:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
I like DIP54 and I think the work on fixing tuples is awesome, but I
have 1 nit-picky question: why is it called
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 16:11:15 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
Understood. I was just expressing my initial impression: that
it seemed strange that a symbol declared as a
`TemplateArgumentList` was neither passed nor received as
template arguments.
My hope is that having such surprising name
On 06/28/2014 09:40 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
We'd make a step forward when we stop calling type tuples type tuples.
They are not tuples, and do not contain (only) types.
I agree, but that's what they're called in the
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 09:15:18PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 16:11:15 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
Understood. I was just expressing my initial impression: that it
seemed strange that a symbol declared as a `TemplateArgumentList` was
neither passed nor
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 21:25:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
We've had this discussion before (and not just once), that
tuple is a
misnomer, yada yada yada, but until somebody files a PR to
change this,
things are just going to continue to remain the same. So I'd
say,
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 21:22:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/28/2014 09:40 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
We'd make a step forward when we stop calling type tuples
type tuples.
They are not tuples, and do not contain
On 6/28/14, 6:49 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 21:22:14 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 06/28/2014 09:40 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
We'd make a step forward when we stop calling type tuples type tuples.
They
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 21:51:17 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
I think it's common:
http://julia.readthedocs.org/en/latest/manual/types/#tuple-types
Actually, that section is about normal tuples, there is no
distinction between normal tuples and type tuples in julia.
From Julia repl:
On 06/29/2014 12:42 AM, safety0ff wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 21:51:17 UTC, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
I think it's common:
http://julia.readthedocs.org/en/latest/manual/types/#tuple-types
Actually, that section is about normal tuples, there is no distinction
between normal tuples and
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree, but that's what they're called in the compiler source
code, so
it's kinda hard to call them something else.
Most people never look in compiler source code so lets pretend it
does not exist ;)
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:32:34PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree, but that's what they're called in the compiler source code,
so it's kinda hard to call them something else.
Most people never look
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 19:11:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:32:34PM +, Dicebot via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 05:45:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree, but that's what they're called in the compiler
source
I like DIP54 and I think the work on fixing tuples is awesome,
but I have 1 nit-picky question: why is it called
TemplateArgumentList when it's not always used as template
arguments?
void func(string, string) { }
TypeTuple!(string, string) var;
var[0] = I'm nobody's ;
var[1] =
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
StaticList/ExpandingList/StaticTuple/ExpandingTuple?
I think StaticList is the clearest, really makes it obvious what
it is.
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 03:01:12 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
StaticList/ExpandingList/StaticTuple/ExpandingTuple?
I think StaticList is the clearest, really makes it obvious
what it is.
Static already mean everything, please no.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 05:00:09AM +, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 28 June 2014 at 03:01:12 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Friday, 27 June 2014 at 22:01:21 UTC, Mason McGill wrote:
StaticList/ExpandingList/StaticTuple/ExpandingTuple?
I think StaticList is the clearest,
Very often I use associative array as the simple syntactic way of
representing of pairs of some values. But AAs are slightly
complicated for this task and they don't preserve order inside
it. I could use some struct for example
struct P(T, N)
{
T first;
N second;
}
and write something
Uranuz:
I'd like to see any comments
Built-in tuple literals: good. Just pair literals: no, thanks.
Bye,
bearophile
Thanks for response. I was thinking that adding new statement for
such feature is not very good too. Is there any recent
discussions about tuble literals. There is proposal in wiki but I
don't know if it will be accepted or not for some time. For now
seems like it's better to alias tuple and
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:08:24PM +, Uranuz via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Thanks for response. I was thinking that adding new statement for such
feature is not very good too. Is there any recent discussions about
tuble literals. There is proposal in wiki but I don't know if it will
be accepted
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 21:17:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:08:24PM +, Uranuz via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Thanks for response. I was thinking that adding new statement
for such
feature is not very good too. Is there any recent discussions
about
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 05:35:40AM +, deadalnix via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 21:17:45 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:08:24PM +, Uranuz via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Thanks for response. I was thinking that adding new statement
33 matches
Mail list logo
