On Saturday, 7 May 2016 at 17:56:07 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Saturday, 7 May 2016 at 16:22:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2015/05/05/is-d-slim-yet/
Thanks for repeating the link to that blog article. I was
reminded of it at DConf. Would be great if
On Saturday, 7 May 2016 at 16:22:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
https://blog.thecybershadow.net/2015/05/05/is-d-slim-yet/
Thanks for repeating the link to that blog article. I was
reminded of it at DConf. Would be great if results from GDC and
LDC could be added to the graphs, plus more
On Friday, 6 May 2016 at 08:07:30 UTC, Pjotr Prins wrote:
At Dconf we had a discussion on creating reproducible builds of
the D compilers. One thing that is required is bootstrapping
the build. In GNU Guix we start from a working C compiler which
is a reasonable starting point (it could have
On Saturday, 7 May 2016 at 08:53:10 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
GNU Guix can be used as a reproducible reference build system
where we capture the bootstrapping process nicely and test the
builds on the build farm(s) whenever something changes.
I like the idea.
I thought about that too but would
On Friday, 6 May 2016 at 08:07:30 UTC, Pjotr Prins wrote:
At Dconf we had a discussion on creating reproducible builds of
the D compilers. One thing that is required is bootstrapping
the build. In GNU Guix we start from a working C compiler which
is a reasonable starting point (it could have
At Dconf we had a discussion on creating reproducible builds of
the D compilers. One thing that is required is bootstrapping the
build. In GNU Guix we start from a working C compiler which is a
reasonable starting point (it could have been LISP instead ;)
For D this means that even if all
