On 20/08/14 18:34, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. What I meant was that ddoc will
generate the above structure, so that user ddoc templates can customize
the appearance of each element in the declaration. You don't actually
write any of these macros
Looking at the documentation for std.algorithm and the std.logger
(currently under review) [1] I think the function signatures look
absolutely horrible. The functions std.algorithm in have complicated
template constraints and in std.logger there are many functions with
default arguments like
Jacob Carlborg:
The simplified signatures would be show for the main
signatures, i.e. the ones with a light blue background, and the
full signatures would be added at the end of the documentation
for each symbol.
Another possible improvement is to add popups that show the
complete type
On 20.8.2014 9:04, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Looking at the documentation for std.algorithm and the std.logger
(currently under review) [1] I think the function signatures look
absolutely horrible. The functions std.algorithm in have complicated
template constraints and in
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 07:04:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
* Remove template constraints. I think, at least with
std.algorithm, it's mostly obvious what to pass and I rarely
need to look at the constraints
BTW aren't they a bit over-complicated?
(args.length == 0 || (args.length 0
On Wednesday, 20 August 2014 at 07:04:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Looking at the documentation for std.algorithm and the
std.logger (currently under review) [1] I think the function
signatures look absolutely horrible. The functions
std.algorithm in have complicated template constraints and
The simplified signatures would be show for the main
signatures, i.e. the ones with a light blue background, and the
full signatures would be added at the end of the documentation
for each symbol.
I like it. Some of my code also features a lot of free functions
with template constraints and
On 20/08/14 10:20, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I think this is important when discussion about language complexity, as
the discussions in the Scala community show.
Scala has simplified signatures for a few methods as well, see:
On 20/08/14 09:35, bearophile wrote:
Another possible improvement is to add popups that show the complete
type when the mouse is over the name of a type or value.
You can see that used in this F# code:
http://tomasp.net/blog/2014/puzzling-fsharp/
And in this near-Haskell code:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Looking at the documentation for std.algorithm and the std.logger
(currently under review) [1] I think the function signatures look
absolutely horrible. The functions std.algorithm in have complicated
template
On 2014-08-20 16:59, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
No, I want to see all parameters in the docs.
If it was unclear, all parameters will be available in the full
signature that is available in the generated docs as well.
I disagree.
See above
If we had more control over the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:15:39PM +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 2014-08-20 16:59, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Basically, the formatting of declarations need to be more structured.
Currently we can only format the entire giant declaration as a unit,
and
12 matches
Mail list logo
