I wonder what it's going to look like to see byChunk and chunkBy
next to each other.
On Sunday, 15 February 2015 at 19:42:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/15/15 11:34 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14183
Fantastic, thanks! Remember we plan to release on March 1. --
I am somewhat confused. I know these changes have been done. The
On 4/17/15 2:30 PM, Ulrich =?UTF-8?B?S8O8dHRsZXIi?=
kuett...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 15 February 2015 at 19:42:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/15/15 11:34 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14183
Fantastic, thanks! Remember we plan to release on
On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 19:39:44 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Peter, could you please take this?
Yep, I have some time.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14183
On 2/15/15 11:34 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 19:39:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Peter, could you please take this?
Yep, I have some time.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14183
Fantastic, thanks! Remember we plan to release on March 1. --
On 2/13/15 3:45 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 18:32:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Perhaps rename groupBy to chunkBy. People coming from SQL and other
languages might expect groupBy to do hash-based grouping.
Agreed.
* The unary function implementation
Looks like there's a backlog of stuff to finalize for groupBy and aggregate:
* Perhaps rename groupBy to chunkBy. People coming from SQL and other
languages might expect groupBy to do hash-based grouping.
* The unary function implementation must return for each group a tuple
consisting of
On Friday, 13 February 2015 at 18:32:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
* Perhaps rename groupBy to chunkBy. People coming from SQL and
other languages might expect groupBy to do hash-based grouping.
Agreed.
* The unary function implementation must return for each group
a tuple consisting
