On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 14:00:46 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
I'm not sure if the new syntax is worth adding, though.
`T{...}` (or `T[...]`) saves just one character over `T!(...)`.
The latter can be done without touching the language. For the
value tuple, one can do `alias t =
On 05.04.2016 22:48, ZombineDev wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 20:13:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05.04.2016 17:29, ZombineDev wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 05:45:08 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
{} for tuples hasn't worked out since it was deemed ambiguous with
delegate syntax (was it
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 20:13:59 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 05.04.2016 17:29, ZombineDev wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 05:45:08 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
{} for tuples hasn't worked out since it was deemed ambiguous
with
delegate syntax (was it for the case of empty
On 05.04.2016 17:29, ZombineDev wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 05:45:08 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
{} for tuples hasn't worked out since it was deemed ambiguous with
delegate syntax (was it for the case of empty statements/tuple?).
How about the following syntax instead:
{} //
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 16:34:49 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 15:29:06 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
Action action = {}; // error: `{}` is an empty tuple, can't be
assigned to delegates
auto t = {}; // deduced as an empty tuple.
Also, the non-empty {} syntax can't be mistaken
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 16:56:15 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
Tuple and AliasSeq are library types, so the chance that they
will be added into the language is slim to none.
Yes on Tuple, but AliasSeq actually is in the language (just
unnamed there, it is what you get with T... in a template
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 05:45:08 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
{} for tuples hasn't worked out since it was deemed ambiguous
with delegate syntax (was it for the case of empty
statements/tuple?).
How about the following syntax instead:
{} // delegate (existing syntax)
q{...} // string
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 15:29:06 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
Action action = {}; // error: `{}` is an empty tuple, can't be
assigned to delegates
auto t = {}; // deduced as an empty tuple.
Also, the non-empty {} syntax can't be mistaken for a function
literal because non-empty function literals
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 05:45:08 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
{} for tuples hasn't worked out since it was deemed ambiguous
with delegate syntax (was it for the case of empty
statements/tuple?).
How about the following syntax instead:
{} // delegate (existing syntax)
q{...} // string
On 05.04.2016 07:45, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d wrote:
How about the following syntax instead:
{} // delegate (existing syntax)
q{...} // string literal (existing syntax)
t{...} // tuple(a,b) (proposed syntax)
T{...} // TypeTuple!(a,b) (proposed syntax)
In existing syntax, most
{} for tuples hasn't worked out since it was deemed ambiguous with
delegate syntax (was it for the case of empty statements/tuple?).
How about the following syntax instead:
{} // delegate (existing syntax)
q{...} // string literal (existing syntax)
t{...} // tuple(a,b) (proposed syntax)
11 matches
Mail list logo
