Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-09 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
Am 07.06.2017 um 11:44 schrieb Ali Çehreli: Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not higher in the rating... https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=fortune Ali There are thread scaling issues in the tested version. The test setup there uses a 40

Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-09 Thread Elvis Zhou via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 15:40:37 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: On 06/08/2017 05:09 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote: > Wow. Answer was actually visible before the OP. THAT is what I would > call fast. Did you use vibe.d? Your answer hasn't arrived yet. Using something other than vibe.d? :p

Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-08 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d
On 06/08/2017 05:09 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl wrote: > Wow. Answer was actually visible before the OP. THAT is what I would > call fast. Did you use vibe.d? Your answer hasn't arrived yet. Using something other than vibe.d? :p Ali

Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-08 Thread Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 21:18:21 UTC, ketmar wrote: Ozan wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 09:44:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not higher in the rating... https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=fortune

Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-07 Thread H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:18:21AM +0300, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Ozan wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 09:44:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: > > > Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not > > > higher in the rating... > > > > > >

Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-07 Thread ketmar via Digitalmars-d
Ozan wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 09:44:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not higher in the rating... https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=fortune Same for me. I used a lot of Java (Jetty, Tomcat) and Groovy

Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-07 Thread bauss via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 14:56:56 UTC, Ozan wrote: On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 09:44:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not higher in the rating... https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=fortune Ali Same for me.

Re: vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-07 Thread Ozan via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 09:44:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not higher in the rating... https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=fortune Ali Same for me. I used a lot of Java (Jetty, Tomcat) and Groovy (Grails)

vibe.d on Web Framework Benchmarks

2017-06-07 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d
Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not higher in the rating... https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14=ph=fortune Ali