Re: mysql-native: preview2

2017-02-01 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 2 February 2017 at 06:50:34 UTC, Suliman wrote: On Thursday, 2 February 2017 at 05:28:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Made a couple more long-needed changes while I'm at it: https://github.com/Abscissa/mysql-native-experimental Tag: v0.2.0-preview2 - For better clarity, renamed

Re: mysql-native: preview2

2017-02-01 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 2 February 2017 at 05:28:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote: Made a couple more long-needed changes while I'm at it: https://github.com/Abscissa/mysql-native-experimental Tag: v0.2.0-preview2 - For better clarity, renamed `mysql.db.MysqlDB` to `mysql.pool.MySqlPool`. - Package

Re: mysql-native: preview2

2017-02-01 Thread Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
Made a couple more long-needed changes while I'm at it: https://github.com/Abscissa/mysql-native-experimental Tag: v0.2.0-preview2 - For better clarity, renamed `mysql.db.MysqlDB` to `mysql.pool.MySqlPool`. - Package mysql.connection no longer acts as a package.d, publicly importing other

Re: mysql-native: API Refresh RC

2017-02-01 Thread Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 02/01/2017 01:54 PM, Suliman wrote: Also I can't understand what is SQL Command and what exec is doing if it's returning ulong? "struct Command" should not be used. It is old, and a bad design. This new release attempts to replace it with a better design. Hopefully, "struct Command"

Re: mysql-native: API Refresh RC

2017-02-01 Thread Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 02/01/2017 10:34 AM, Suliman wrote: On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 14:06:39 UTC, Suliman wrote: Am I right understand that Connection instance should created at constructor and be one single for all class (and it will be reused by fibers) or am I wrong? If yes, where I should to close it?

Re: mysql-native: API Refresh RC

2017-02-01 Thread Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 02/01/2017 05:04 AM, Suliman wrote: Plz update dub package on code.dlang.org It's deliberately not in the main mysql-mative package just yet. I will put it there once people have a chance to try this, and it becomes clear there aren't any big problems with the redesign. For now, this

Re: mysql-native: API Refresh RC

2017-02-01 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
Also I can't understand what is SQL Command and what exec is doing if it's returning ulong?

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

2017-02-01 Thread Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, February 1, 2017, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce < digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote: > As I have previously announced > (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am > stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D. > > That means

Re: mysql-native: API Refresh RC

2017-02-01 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 14:06:39 UTC, Suliman wrote: Am I right understand that Connection instance should created at constructor and be one single for all class (and it will be reused by fibers) or am I wrong? If yes, where I should to close it? To put scope(exit) c.close(); In

Re: Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

2017-02-01 Thread bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 12:47:51 UTC, Dicebot wrote: As I have previously announced (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D. That means there are 3 possibilities: - No one will adopt them and all

Re: mysql-native: API Refresh RC

2017-02-01 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am I right understand that Connection instance should created at constructor and be one single for all class (and it will be reused by fibers) or am I wrong? If yes, where I should to close it? To put scope(exit) c.close(); In destructor? If yes, does it behavior should be same as for

Re: vibe.d 0.8.0 and 0.7.31 beta releases

2017-02-01 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am 01.02.2017 um 10:46 schrieb aberba: On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 09:35:02 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 31.01.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Sönke Ludwig: The first release of the revamped core module [1] is nearing, and along with that, a compatible vibe.d release (0.8.0). The new core module is

Re: LDC 1.1.0 released

2017-02-01 Thread Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 03:43:10 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote: Version 1.1.0 of LDC, the LLVM-based D compiler, has finally been released: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/releases/tag/v1.1.0 Great work.

Call for arms: Arch Linux D package maintenance

2017-02-01 Thread Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce
As I have previously announced (http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6fbbu$1qli$1...@digitalmars.com), I am stepping down from maintaining Arch Linux packages for D. That means there are 3 possibilities: - No one will adopt them and all packages will be moved to AUR - Some existing Trusted User decided

Re: LDC 1.1.0 released

2017-02-01 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
Awesome!

Re: mysql-native: API Refresh RC

2017-02-01 Thread Suliman via Digitalmars-d-announce
Plz update dub package on code.dlang.org

Re: vibe.d 0.8.0 and 0.7.31 beta releases

2017-02-01 Thread aberba via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 at 09:35:02 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Am 31.01.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Sönke Ludwig: The first release of the revamped core module [1] is nearing, and along with that, a compatible vibe.d release (0.8.0). The new core module is still opt-in in this release and can

Re: vibe.d 0.8.0 and 0.7.31 beta releases

2017-02-01 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am 31.01.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Sönke Ludwig: The first release of the revamped core module [1] is nearing, and along with that, a compatible vibe.d release (0.8.0). The new core module is still opt-in in this release and can be activated using a `subConfiguration "vibe-d:core" "vibe-core"`

Re: vibe.d 0.8.0 and 0.7.31 beta releases

2017-02-01 Thread Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d-announce
Am 31.01.2017 um 20:38 schrieb Arun Chandrasekaran: On Tuesday, 31 January 2017 at 11:11:28 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote: [1]: https://github.com/vibe-d/vibe-core Is vibe-core still in alpha stage? Github page says so. It's de-facto beta stage, but I still need to add a beta tag and update the