Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 28 November 2014 at 06:40, Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote: weaselcat wrote in message news:rnlbybkfqokypxlgf...@forum.dlang.org... I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future fall under? Generally 'future

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Chris via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 13:24:04 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:10:25 -0800 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote: I know it's a tough call. But I do see these sorts of comments regularly, and it is a

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Chris via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 12:06:06 UTC, Chris wrote: On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 13:24:04 UTC, ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:10:25 -0800 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote: I know it's a tough call. But

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Tomer Rosenschtein via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D. Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll. From the article: The D programming language has quickly become our language of choice on the Data Science team for any task that

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
Tomer Rosenschtein: Awesome article. Paper of the week is a modest word for this. The D code is not good. Bye, bearophile

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Tomer Rosenschtein via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote: Tomer Rosenschtein: Awesome article. Paper of the week is a modest word for this. The D code is not good. Bye, bearophile But it was worth a reddit and hackerNews redirection: look at that this fuckin genious who understand

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Tomer Rosenschtein via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:18:09 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein wrote: On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote: Tomer Rosenschtein: Awesome article. Paper of the week is a modest word for this. The D code is not good. Bye, bearophile But it was worth a reddit and

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote: Tomer Rosenschtein: Awesome article. Paper of the week is a modest word for this. The D code is not good. Bye, bearophile Maybe not good by the standards of this group, but it does represent the efforts of someone doing 'real

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Tomer Rosenschtein via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote: On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote: Tomer Rosenschtein: Awesome article. Paper of the week is a modest word for this. The D code is not good. Bye, bearophile Maybe not good by the standards of

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread CraigDillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:41:12 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein wrote: On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote: On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote: Tomer Rosenschtein: Awesome article. Paper of the week is a modest word for this. The D

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
CraigDillabaugh: Maybe not good by the standards of this group, but it does represent the efforts of someone doing 'real work', so I think it is worthwhile. Perhaps part of the cause of the low quality of the code in that blog post is the design of D language is not bondage enough. This

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Tomer Rosenschtein via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:57:31 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote: On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:41:12 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein wrote: On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote: On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote: Tomer Rosenschtein:

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-28 Thread Tomer Rosenschtein via Digitalmars-d-announce
happy shabbat. Shallom. See ya.

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-27 Thread Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d-announce
weaselcat wrote in message news:rnlbybkfqokypxlgf...@forum.dlang.org... I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future fall under? Generally 'future deprecation' means at least 6 months after it gets turned into a warning. Often it's significantly longer, because

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-25 Thread Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 01:10:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 11/24/2014 4:50 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:34:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code thread. I would caution against

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-25 Thread Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 01:10:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: I know it's a tough call. But I do see these sorts of comments regularly, and it is a fact that there are too many D libraries gone to seed that won't compile anymore, and that makes us look bad. Or this:

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-25 Thread bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
weaselcat: I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future fall under? For us that activate warnings in dmd (because for a design mistake they are disabled on default, but hopefully this will be fixed in future) in the latest github version of the compiler it gives a

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-25 Thread ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:10:25 -0800 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com wrote: I know it's a tough call. But I do see these sorts of comments regularly, and it is a fact that there are too many D libraries gone to seed that won't compile anymore,

D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d-announce
Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D. Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll. From the article: The D programming language has quickly become our language of choice on the Data Science team for any task that requires efficiency, and is now the keystone language for our

D is for Data Science - reddit discussion

2014-11-24 Thread MrSmith via Digitalmars-d-announce
D is for Data Science by Andrew Pascoe http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n9gfb/d_is_for_data_science/

Re: D is for Data Science - reddit discussion

2014-11-24 Thread MrSmith via Digitalmars-d-announce
Haven't noticed that it was already posted. Sorry about that. The disscussion is here http://forum.dlang.org/thread/qeyftagcvkhjjeeba...@forum.dlang.org

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread weaselcat via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D. Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll. From the article: The D programming language has quickly become our language of choice on the Data Science team for any task that

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
25-Nov-2014 00:34, weaselcat пишет: On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D. Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll. From the article: The D programming language has quickly become our language of choice on the

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
Dmitry Olshansky: Why is File.byLine so slow? Seems to be mostly fixed sometime ago. Really? I am not so sure. Bye, bearophile

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/24/2014 2:25 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: [...] Excellent comments. Please post them on the reddit page!

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Jay Norwood via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 15:27:19 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote: Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D. Written by Andrew Pascoe of AdRoll. From the article: The D programming language has quickly become our language of choice on the Data Science team for any task that

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Jay Norwood via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Monday, 24 November 2014 at 23:32:14 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote: Is this related? https://github.com/dscience-developers/dscience This seems good too. Why the comments in the discussion about lack of libraries? https://github.com/kyllingstad/scid/wiki

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
25-Nov-2014 01:28, bearophile пишет: Dmitry Olshansky: Why is File.byLine so slow? Seems to be mostly fixed sometime ago. Really? I am not so sure. Bye, bearophile I too has suspected it in the past and then I tested it. Now I test it again, it's always easier to check then to argue.

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread bearophile via Digitalmars-d-announce
Dmitry Olshansky: Which is 1:1 parity. Another myth busted? ;) There is still an open bug report: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11810 Do you want also to benchmark that byLineFast that for me is usually significantly faster than the byLine? Bye, bearophile

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce
25-Nov-2014 02:43, bearophile пишет: Dmitry Olshansky: Which is 1:1 parity. Another myth busted? ;) dmitry@Ubu64 ~ $ time ./my2 log real0m0.065s user0m0.042s sys0m0.023s dmitry@Ubu64 ~ $ time ./my2 log real0m0.063s user0m0.040s sys0m0.023s Read the above

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/24/2014 7:27 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote: Just browsing reddit and found this article posted about D. https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2n9gfb/d_is_for_data_science/cmbn83i Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code thread.

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:34:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code thread. I would caution against putting very much weight in Reddit opinions - there's people who will never use D and just look for excuses to

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
On 11/24/2014 4:50 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote: On Tuesday, 25 November 2014 at 00:34:30 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: Thought I'd post this as a counterpoint to the recent please break our code thread. I would caution against putting very much weight in Reddit opinions - there's people who will

Re: D is for Data Science

2014-11-24 Thread weaselcat via Digitalmars-d-announce
With algorithm.sort the deciles bench from the article runs twice as fast(it's in the reddit thread) I see array.sort is planned for future deprecation, what does future fall under?