Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with cyclic
imports. Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not really
acceptable. Is there any chance for this to be fixed?
IMO it is the cyclic import that is the bug ;)
Brad Roberts wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-02-27 16:37:13 -0500, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com said:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ordinarily, I detest the idea of pulling support for anything as
recent as just a few years old. But Apple themselves has a habit of
ignoring users of anything
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, áîáåô bo...@abv-nospam.bg wrote:
Hi guys,
if someone is interested in wrapper classes for Poppler (pdf library) - give
me a note at afrikanski at gmail dot com.
Regards,
bobef
Why don't you release them publicly?
Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
On 2009-02-27 21:49:58 +0100, Fawzi Mohamed fmoha...@mac.com said:
On 2009-02-27 21:10:29 +0100, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com said:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Now we have to make a manual init function called from class
constructors. I understand that
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Yigal Chripunyigal...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with the above but there is still a small issue here:
A module is a single file and when you have several large classes that are
tightly coupled you can get a very big file with
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
Lars Ivar Igesund Wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with cyclic
imports. Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not really
acceptable. Is there any chance for this to be fixed?
IMO it is the
Hello Moritz,
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:53:03 -0500, bobef wrote:
Because I'm lazy and I doubt there will be any interest. But if you
want I can send them to you and you can release them publicly ;)
I would suggest
http://dsource.org/projects/scrapple
Just make a ticket. :)
bobef: post your
On 2009-02-28 14:54:26 +0100, Christopher Wright dhase...@gmail.com said:
Lutger wrote:
grauzone wrote:
Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
Eldar Insafutdinov wrote:
We faced a bug that module static constructors don't work with cyclic
imports. Currently it's fixed with a dirty hack which is not
Yigal Chripun wrote:
this is related to D's compilation model which is copied from C/C++ and
it seems to me that this model is outdated. C#'s model of assemblies and
metadata seems more capable. for instance there's no need for header
files, that info is stored in the metadata of the assembly.
Christopher Wright wrote:
Additionally, the compiler has sufficient information to complain about
the problem at compile time, but it doesn't. That is a bug.
No, it does not. The compiler doesn't know about private imports of
separately compiled modules.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Additionally, the compiler has sufficient information to complain about
the problem at compile time, but it doesn't. That is a bug.
No, it does not. The compiler doesn't know about
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
See it's funny, since in the other post, you said that using an
autogenerated header file is semantically indistinguishable from
compiling it to a metadata file. And here you're pointing out an
obvious shortcoming!
You can make hand-generated ones, too. The idea of
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:03:05 -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
See it's funny, since in the other post, you said that using an
autogenerated header file is semantically indistinguishable from
compiling it to a metadata file. And here you're
Sean Kelly wrote:
One somewhat weird issue that we may have to face at some point is that
Posix functions whose behavior was changed have had the symbol for the
new function changed to _blah$UNIX2003, with the old function left in
place. Since D can't declare symbols like this, we may end
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
extern(C) void __identifier(blah$UNIX2003)(int);
A beneficial side-effect is that I can finally get rid of all those
mixins that are just doing this:
mixin(`void `~name_of_fn~`(int a)
{
// ... rest of
Yigal Chripun wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Yigal Chripunyigal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with the above but there is still a small issue here:
A module is a single file and when you have several large classes
that are
tightly coupled you can get a very big file with thousands
Walter Bright wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Daniel Keep
daniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
extern(C) void __identifier(blah$UNIX2003)(int);
A beneficial side-effect is that I can finally get rid of all those
mixins that are just doing this:
17 matches
Mail list logo
