Walter Bright wrote:
In Astoria, Oregon, on September 20-22 I'll be hosting a Compiler
Construction seminar along with Cristian Vlasceanu.
http://www.astoriaseminar.com/compiler-construction.html
It'll be a two day intensive course in how compilers work and how to
build them.
Curse
Daniel Keep wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
In Astoria, Oregon, on September 20-22 I'll be hosting a Compiler
Construction seminar along with Cristian Vlasceanu.
http://www.astoriaseminar.com/compiler-construction.html
It'll be a two day intensive course in how compilers work and how to
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:19:27 +1300, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com
wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
In Astoria, Oregon, on September 20-22 I'll be hosting a Compiler
Construction seminar along with Cristian Vlasceanu.
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Christopher Wright wrote:
Additionally, the compiler has sufficient information to complain
about the problem at compile time, but it doesn't. That is a bug.
No, it does not. The compiler doesn't
Walter Bright wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:
this is related to D's compilation model which is copied from C/C++
and it seems to me that this model is outdated. C#'s model of
assemblies and metadata seems more capable. for instance there's no
need for header files, that info is stored in the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
The D system has a major limitation, though -- you can't split the source
for a module across multiple files. Which pushes you towards enormous source
files. It's more restricted than both C# and C++ in this respect.
Yeah.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
In Astoria, Oregon, on September 20-22 I'll be hosting a Compiler
Construction seminar along with Cristian Vlasceanu.
http://www.astoriaseminar.com/compiler-construction.html
It'll be a two day intensive course
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
The D system has a major limitation, though -- you can't split the source
for a module across multiple files. Which pushes you towards enormous source
files. It's more restricted than both C# and C++ in
Bill Baxter wrote:
What kind of pre-reqs are necessary?
Fluency with C, C++, D, C# or Java. Some experience with an assembler
language or virtual machine bytecode is desirable.
Bill Baxter wbax...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.888.1235931134.22690.digitalmars-d-annou...@puremagic.com...
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
In Astoria, Oregon, on September 20-22 I'll be hosting a Compiler
Construction seminar along
Walter Bright wrote:
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
The problem if it detects it in an implementation-defined manner is
the source code is no longer portable.
... If the result of compilation provably won't *run* anyway, what's
the problem with a compile-time error?
Nothing,
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Not even on a best-effort basis?
It doesn't have to catch every possible case; I for one would be
perfectly fine with it if it didn't catch the I omitted a private
import from my .di file case...
Doing so would require full blown data flow analysis, which the front
Daniel Keep wrote:
Sean Kelly wrote:
One somewhat weird issue that we may have to face at some point is that
Posix functions whose behavior was changed have had the symbol for the
new function changed to _blah$UNIX2003, with the old function left in
place. Since D can't declare symbols like
Sean Kelly wrote:
Daniel Keep wrote:
extern(C) void __identifier(blah$UNIX2003)(int);
That would be awesome.
A beneficial side-effect is that I can finally get rid of all those
mixins that are just doing this:
mixin(`void `~name_of_fn~`(int a)
{
// ... rest of function ...
}`);
I had
Hello Walter,
Robert Fraser wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.nwcpp.org/
!!! I had a lab or I would have gone ;-( Any chance of a
video...?
Bartosz videotaped it, I imagine he'll put it up on the nwcpp.org web
site soon.
Bump ?
I've just finished a two-part blog/article/tutorial on profiling.
Anybody interested, welcome.
http://snakecoder.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/profiling-with-dmd-on-windows/
http://snakecoder.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/profiling-with-dmd-on-windows-getting-hands-dirty/
Walter also posted the first one
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:12:28 +0300, Sergey Gromov wrote:
I've just finished a two-part blog/article/tutorial on profiling.
Anybody interested, welcome.
http://snakecoder.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/profiling-with-dmd-on-
windows/
17 matches
Mail list logo
