Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On April 1? What is this, a joke? ;-)
It's still March here!
Walter Bright wrote:
The large volume of bug fixes is because a lot of people contributed
patches. Thanks!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.042.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.027.zip
Olli Aalto wrote:
main.d = main
Error: version identifier 'Posix' is reserved and cannot be set
Command /home/oaalto/D/dsss/bin/rebuild returned with code 256, aborting.
Error: Command failed, aborting.
Wasn't this supposed to be fixed for 1.042 too?
Yes. I goofed that up. Sorry.
davidl:
why not make opDot some compile time stuff?
You mean run time.
this can be particular useful for COM
And GUIs, I guess. It smells of Object-C++, but the syntax is nicer.
But such runtime code must be not included into the executable if this feature
is nowhere used in the code. D
bearophile wrote:
davidl:
why not make opDot some compile time stuff?
You mean run time.
No, he means compile time. The name becomes a template value parameter,
which is available at compile time.
this can be particular useful for COM
And GUIs, I guess. It smells of Object-C++, but
Walter Bright:
On Windows, if there are multiple source files on the command line they are
now read with a background thread. This may speed up compilation.
I have tried on Windows, on a 2-core CPU and the CPU usage is about 50% still
(only one core used). I have not timed much difference in
bearophile wrote:
I have tried on Windows, on a 2-core CPU and the CPU usage is about 50%
still (only one core used).
Well, I that's a pure reader thread running in the bg it wouldn't take any
cpu time. That's because it's basically just waiting for data transfers from
the disk to put them in
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
The large volume of bug fixes is because a lot of people contributed
patches. Thanks!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.042.zip
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
The large volume of bug fixes is because a lot of people contributed
patches. Thanks!
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.042.zip
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
Is it just me though, or does the D2 win32 build crash after successfully
building
the project? For me it works, but then crashes instead of exiting
gracefully. No
big deal, though, as this is the Jargon File's definition of a minor
I've thought of that a couple times, and there was a reason it was a
problem, I just can't remember it at the moment!
Lars Kyllingstad wrote:
...because the file dmd/linux/lib/libphobos2.a is empty.
Fixed.
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:gr09qr$179...@digitalmars.com...
Yes, I'm wondering if this will finally let us do something along the
lines of:
template Foo()
{
alias blah blah this;
// Was: const char[] Foo = blah blah;
}
Or, perhaps more likely, wondering if
bearophile wrote:
davidl:
why not make opDot some compile time stuff?
You mean run time.
this can be particular useful for COM
And GUIs, I guess. It smells of Object-C++, but the syntax is nicer.
But such runtime code must be not included into the executable if this feature
is nowhere
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
It's just you. g. The win32 build works fine for me.
Never mind, it looks to be related to some strange options my IDE is passing
to DMD.
Just tell it to stop passing -hcf [1].
-- Daniel
[1] HCF: Halt and Catch Fire, an
15 matches
Mail list logo
