No.
If we had D and D2, then we'll need D3 (and D4). And we don't need
both a D([1]) and a D.learn newsgroup. Not enough volume three groups.
We need _D.programming_ and _D.future_, that's all.
Once they're up, we post into d.learn that please post in D.programming
instead, and in D
Jarrett Billingsley, el 12 de mayo a las 01:01 me escribiste:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Is this a good idea?
My gut reaction is 'yes'. But what would be left on .D without the
hundred-post threads about ranges? There really _isn't_
Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
and what happened to 1.044 ?
-Tomas
Walter usuallly updates the changelog pages just before the
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Paul D. Anderson
paul.d.removethis.ander...@comcast.andthis.net wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen Wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
check their builds against it.
== Quote from Tomas Lindquist Olsen (tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com)'s article
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html#new2_030
and what happened to 1.044 ?
-Tomas
Probably because it
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could check
their builds against it.
I do apologize if I made a lot
On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:41:50 -0400, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Tomas Lindquist Olsen (tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com)'s article
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
http://digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html#new1_045
* added .typeinfo to ClassInfo
Very nice. Maybe I can go remove some hacks from my code now...
== Quote from Robert Jacques (sandf...@jhu.edu)'s article
On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:41:50 -0400, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Tomas Lindquist Olsen (tomas.l.ol...@gmail.com)'s article
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
What about D.programming and D.compilers
Then all programming questions goes to D.programming
and D.compilers could be the goto group for discussion
on compiler design.
Close D.learn and D.gnu.
I agree the D.learn sounds like it is for newbies.
And I think that all the compilers could benefit
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could check
their builds against it.
I do apologize if I made a lot
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Is this a good idea?
I think it's a great idea, there's some decent arguments that they
should have more general names, but I like the idea that you'd always
know which group to look in for specific issues, even
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
I do apologize if I made a lot of people download a broken DMD
release, but ... Some people watch the changelog, so if you don't want
to release to be public, don't update the site!
I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
dsimcha wrote:
Or is the automatic synchronization of shared variables part not supposed to be
implemented yet?
The implementation of the synchronization of shared variables is not
done yet. It's a big step to just make the default thread local, and to
upgrade the static type system.
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
dsimcha wrote:
Or is the automatic synchronization of shared variables part not supposed
to be
implemented yet?
The implementation of the synchronization of shared variables is not
done yet. It's a big step to just make
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
I think it's a great idea, there's some decent arguments that they
should have more general names, but I like the idea that you'd always
know which group to look in for specific issues, even when we're at
D4!
I do have reservations about the idea, based on
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
I think it's a great idea, there's some decent arguments that they
should have more general names, but I like the idea that you'd always
know which group to look in for specific
Walter Bright:
I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
I can see a large number of bugfixes. Lot of work.
DMD v1.042 compiles my dlibs fine. But if I try to compile them with v1.045 the
compiler prints before stopping:
Assertion failure: '0' on line 136 in file
Walter Bright wrote:
Is this a good idea?
No, promoting D also means having a couple of newsgroup entries each day.
Otherwise you'll have several 10 entries a month D newsgroups and this
imo not very appealing to new visitors.
In other words, Bier erm, quantity rulez.
Björn
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
However, why propose it if you don't like the idea in the first place ?
I changed my mind.
BLS wrote:
No, promoting D also means having a couple of newsgroup entries each day.
Otherwise you'll have several 10 entries a month D newsgroups and this
imo not very appealing to new visitors.
In other words, Bier erm, quantity rulez.
Yeah, I had second thoughts along those same lines.
Walter Bright wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
I think it's a great idea, there's some decent arguments that they
should have more general names, but I like the idea that you'd always
know which group to look in for specific issues, even when we're at
D4!
I do have reservations about
bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
I can see a large number of bugfixes. Lot of work.
DMD v1.042 compiles my dlibs fine. But if I try to compile them with
v1.045 the compiler prints before stopping:
Assertion failure: '0' on line 136
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
bearophile wrote:
Walter Bright:
I suppose at this point we might as well make it official.
I can see a large number of bugfixes. Lot of work.
DMD v1.042 compiles my dlibs fine. But if I try to compile them with
dsimcha wrote:
So __gshared is expected to stick around as part of the spec long term?
Yes.
It's not
something that you just hacked in there for now so that, for example, druntime
would compile?
It's so users can cowboy quick and dirty changes to get their code to
work. It isn't allowed
On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:59:05 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
BLS wrote:
No, promoting D also means having a couple of newsgroup entries each day.
Otherwise you'll have several 10 entries a month D newsgroups and
this imo not very appealing to new visitors.
In other
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
BLS wrote:
No, promoting D also means having a couple of newsgroup entries each
day.
Otherwise you'll have several 10 entries a month D newsgroups and
this imo not very appealing to new visitors.
In other words, Bier erm, quantity rulez.
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
BLS wrote:
No, promoting D also means having a couple of newsgroup entries each
day.
Otherwise you'll have several 10 entries a month D newsgroups and
this imo not very appealing to new visitors.
In other words, Bier erm, quantity rulez.
Derek Parnell wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:59:05 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
BLS wrote:
No, promoting D also means having a couple of newsgroup entries each day.
Otherwise you'll have several 10 entries a month D newsgroups and
this imo not very appealing to new
On Wed, 13 May 2009 00:46:25 +0200, BLS wrote:
Derek, may I contact you by Skype ?
Sure.
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 12 de mayo a las 09:40 me escribiste:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
check their builds against it.
I think a better way to do
Hello BLS,
(I think it is not really top secret to talk about what is in use.
1) OCAML, 2) C and 3) ADA ... )
The only surprise there (if any) is OCAML. *Everyone* uses C and, last I
heard, Ada is still the #1 choice for Bugs==DeadBodiesOrWorse development.
From what I've heard, it's
Derek Parnell wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:59:05 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
BLS wrote:
No, promoting D also means having a couple of newsgroup entries each day.
Otherwise you'll have several 10 entries a month D newsgroups and
this imo not very appealing to new
Christopher Wright, el 12 de mayo a las 19:14 me escribiste:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 12 de mayo a las 09:40 me escribiste:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Yes, I sent it to people who'd asked for a prerelease so they could
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
Is there a reason for the missing announcement ?
Well, traditionally (as during the last ten years), Walter has made the
announcements of new D releases. It's hardly conceivable that he'd
forget to do so, all of a sudden.
If there's no announcement, then
36 matches
Mail list logo
