Re: dmd 1.049 and 2.034 release

2009-10-14 Thread Eldar Insafutdinov
Walter Bright Wrote: Rainer Schuetze wrote: Hi, the problem is related to a change that was probably done to improve http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1170 see my comments there for more details. I checked into svn a compiler change folding in your patch. Can you

Re: dmd 1.050 and 2.035 release

2009-10-14 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Walter Bright, el 14 de octubre a las 20:46 me escribiste: The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were blocking QtD and Tango. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip

Re: dmd 1.050 and 2.035 release

2009-10-14 Thread Jeremie Pelletier
Walter Bright wrote: The main purpose of this is to correct a couple of regressions that were blocking QtD and Tango. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.050.zip http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/changelog.html

Re: dmd 1.050 and 2.035 release

2009-10-14 Thread Walter Bright
Jeremie Pelletier wrote: Sweet, JSON output, looks like it wasn't very hard to write :) It was rather trivial. But it's a bit primitive right now. The problem is I'm not writing a consumer of this data, so I'm not sure what it should contain. Consider it as a trial balloon. I'm interested

Re: dmd 1.050 and 2.035 release

2009-10-14 Thread bearophile
Walter Bright: Using DMD 2.035 I have tried to compile: void main() {} Using: dmd -X temp.d And the compiler crashes. Regarding the -X name, isn't something like -json better? Or better to unify the switch for json output and normal ddoc output in some way. Even better, DMD2 compilation