On 04/29/2010 03:02 AM, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Hello,
Following the great work that Masahiro Nakagawa and SHOO offered to
Phobos, we are inviting them to join the Phobos developer ranks.
Once the community review of the proposed libraries concludes with
approval, Masahiro
On 04/29/2010 04:55 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:49:56 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Hello,
Following the great work that Masahiro Nakagawa and SHOO offered to
Phobos, we are inviting them to join the Phobos developer ranks.
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date because it infringes on Tango's license.
Andrei
What did I infringe the license of Tango for? For interfaces? For
On 04/29/2010 09:39 AM, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date because it infringes on Tango's license.
Andrei
What did I infringe the
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:21:04 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 04/29/2010 04:55 AM, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:49:56 +0900, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Hello,
Following the great work that Masahiro
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:39:09 +0900, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date because it infringes on Tango's license.
Andrei
What did I
Moritz Warning wrote:
Walter takes any possible copyright taint very serious.
Yes, I do. It is extremely important for D's future that D and Phobos be clear
of any intellectual property legal problems.
Phobos is now under the Boost license, which is the most liberal one we could
find that
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can get
full agreement by their respective devs be converted to the Boost
license.
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can get
full agreement by their respective devs be converted
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can get
full agreement by their respective devs be converted
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:hrcbrr$2t7...@digitalmars.com...
Moritz Warning wrote:
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can get full
agreement by their respective devs
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:34:19 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:24:22 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
Moritz Warning wrote:
[..]
Maybe you can talk to the Tango devs to clear up this matter?
I suggest that the Tango devs convert the Tango modules that can
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Gareth Charnock wrote:
PS: Okay so I just had a looked at the matrix and vector classes in
Ogre3D and irrlicht. Looks like they both define v*v as element wise
multiplication but m*m is matrix multiplication. That just seems even
more inconsistent.
Eigen
I'm a little surprised I didn't see this announced here, at least I can't find
it.
GDB has had the patch accepted!
http://www.llucax.com.ar/blog/blog/post/06d99f3b
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 19:16:49 -0400, Gareth Charnock gareth@gmail.com
wrote:
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Gareth Charnock wrote:
PS: Okay so I just had a looked at the matrix and vector classes in
Ogre3D and irrlicht. Looks like they both define v*v as element wise
multiplication but m*m is
Jesse Phillips wrote:
GDB has had the patch accepted!
Great news!
16 matches
Mail list logo
