On Friday, 2 March 2012 at 12:27:06 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
Dear,
I have do a D 2 port to my dscience project:
https://gitorious.org/dscience/dscience
Any help are welcome
It would be interesting if you would hook up with the guys at
Open Bioinformatics Foundation
Hello,
I created a new Github project, Pegged, a Parsing Expression
Grammar (PEG) generator in D.
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged
docs: https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki
PEG: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing_expression_grammar
The idea is to give the generator a
On 11-03-2012 00:28, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Hello,
I created a new Github project, Pegged, a Parsing Expression Grammar
(PEG) generator in D.
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged
docs: https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki
PEG:
I see you are not the only one who started writing string array
literals like this:
enum PEGCode = grammarCode!(
Grammar - S Definition+ EOI
,Definition - RuleName Arrow Expression
,RuleName - Identifier(ParamList?)
,Expression - Sequence (OR Sequence)*
);
IOW comma on the
Andrej Mitrovic:
IOW comma on the left side. I know it's not a style preference but
actually a (unfortunate but needed) technique for avoiding bugs. :)
To avoid that bug:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Bye,
bearophile
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 00:34, Alex Rønne Petersen xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
Admittedly I have not heard of PEGs before, so I'm curious: Is this powerful
enough to parse a language such as C?
I think so. But you'd have to do add some semantic action to deal with
typedefs and macros.
People
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 00:56, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I see you are not the only one who started writing string array
literals like this:
enum PEGCode = grammarCode!(
Grammar - S Definition+ EOI
,Definition - RuleName Arrow Expression
,RuleName -
On 3/11/12 1:22 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 00:34, Alex Rønne Petersenxtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
Admittedly I have not heard of PEGs before, so I'm curious: Is this powerful
enough to parse a language such as C?
I think so. But you'd have to do add some semantic
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 00:28:42 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Hello,
I created a new Github project, Pegged, a Parsing Expression
Grammar (PEG) generator in D.
Cool! PEGs aren't used all that much for language grammars - primarily because
BNF and EBNF are more traditional I think - but they're
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:26, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I, too, think this is very significant work! Suggestion for Philippe:
instead of this:
enum PEGCode = grammarCode!(
Grammar - S Definition+ EOI
,Definition - RuleName Arrow Expression
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:26, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Any chance you consider adding AST generator actions as discussed in the
main forum a while ago?
The AST is automatically produced, and there are already AST actions
to simplify / guide its creation. There
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:30, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 00:28:42 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Hello,
I created a new Github project, Pegged, a Parsing Expression
Grammar (PEG) generator in D.
Cool! PEGs aren't used all that much for language grammars -
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 08:39:47 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:30, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 00:28:42 Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Hello,
I created a new Github project, Pegged, a Parsing Expression
Grammar (PEG) generator in
On 3/11/12 1:35 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:26, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Splitting on ; is trivial and makes client code considerably easier to
play with.
It's already implemented! No need for ';'
Great! I think you'd be wise to add
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:46, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
Is there an EBNF grammar for D somewhere, I mean outside the dlang docs?
Someone may have been trying to write one, but I don't believe that there's an
official one, and I recall someone complaining the the BNF grammar
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:53, Philippe Sigaud
philippe.sig...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, the separating if done on the rule definitions (Identifier - ...)
Aw, I meant, the separation is done on rule definitions. Damn children
climbing on me to get more breakfast :-)
16 matches
Mail list logo
