On 11/18/2012 1:20 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Honestly, it's the sort of thing that I would have thought wouldn't even be
possible in C++,
I haven't read the proposal, but it is feasible.
On Sunday, 18 November 2012 at 21:21:12 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Also, I think that so many C/C++ devs are so used to the
compile times that
they get with them that it's nowhere near the top of the list
of features that
they want. It probably didn't even occur to many of them. Not
to mentio
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:53:59 Walter Bright wrote:
> There was a proposal to add modules to C++11, but it failed to gather much
> interest.
Honestly, it's the sort of thing that I would have thought wouldn't even be
possible in C++, because it would require too much of a redesign and woul
On 11/18/2012 12:17 PM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
I really don't understand why no one added modules to C and C++, taking into
consideration that the other systems programming languages of the time already
had them.
There was a proposal to add modules to C++11, but it failed to gather much
interest.
Am 18.11.2012 18:51, schrieb Peter Alexander:
On Saturday, 17 November 2012 at 11:03:18 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I just read the slides of a talk from that latest LLVM Developers'
Meeting. It's a talk about modules by Doug Gregor from Apple. It seems
that they already have started to implement
On Saturday, 17 November 2012 at 11:03:18 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I just read the slides of a talk from that latest LLVM
Developers' Meeting. It's a talk about modules by Doug Gregor
from Apple. It seems that they already have started to
implement this new feature in Clang.
It's about time