On 24/01/2013 13:25, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-24 14:12, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
That's a lot of continuing nice work coming out from there, impressive!
BTW, something I've been meaning to ask. I see that in Mono-D you've
developed a hand-written D parser. How long did it take you to
On 24/01/2013 15:11, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:12:31 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 21/01/2013 21:14, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
No, the entire formatting engine is NOT finished yet. :P
Anyway I've created a good compromise solution between releasing
stuff early and
On 2013-01-25 13:01, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
If I was going with that approach I likely would rather port the MonoD
parser since it looks just as good, if not better, and C# would be
easier to port to Java than D.
But the descent.compiler experience (parser ported from DMD's parser)
put me off
On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 12:31:12 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 24/01/2013 15:11, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 13:12:31 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 21/01/2013 21:14, alex wrote:
Hi everyone,
No, the entire formatting engine is NOT finished yet. :P
Anyway I've
On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 13:43:46 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I didn't say anything about porting :) I was suggesting you
integrate the VisualD parser without porting it. That's why I
suggested the one in VisualD and not the one in Mono-D.
I already suggested Rainer to make a
On 2013-01-25 20:00, alex wrote:
I already suggested Rainer to make a native/non-native interface between
VisualD and D_Parser - this will probably happen via COM or so.. and I
dunno anything about that technique. I just can make sure that the
parser library is fully stand-alone, only depending
On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 20:34:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 20:00, alex wrote:
I already suggested Rainer to make a native/non-native
interface between
VisualD and D_Parser - this will probably happen via COM or
so.. and I
dunno anything about that technique. I just can
