On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 07:09:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I'm happy that http://dlang.org/changelog.html; no longer
shows a link
for a yet-to-be-released version of DMD (no sarcasm intended),
but the
release date listed for 2.062 is wrong.
On 2013-02-18 08:31, Walter Bright wrote:
As long as it isn't written in Ruby :-)
I was not referring to what's usually called a scripting language. I
was referring to a script, regardless of language.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 07:31:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
As long as it isn't written in Ruby :-)
But more seriously, a D tool to do it might be interesting.
Here is a simpleton hack:
### RUBY
require nokogiri
require open-uri
# provided the urls are given
changes_new_features_url =
Steven Schveighoffer, el 17 de February a las 22:36 me escribiste:
Also, anyone can go in and change the bugzilla issue titles to
make them more readable.
That actually is not a good thing... Anyone can maliciously affect
the changlog, or alter the changelog at some later point because
On 2013-02-18 10:02, Joshua Niehus wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 07:31:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
As long as it isn't written in Ruby :-)
But more seriously, a D tool to do it might be interesting.
Here is a simpleton hack:
### RUBY
require nokogiri
require open-uri
# provided
18-Feb-2013 11:31, Walter Bright пишет:
On 2/17/2013 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 07:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Since I (and Jonathan) wrote the changelog, I can attest that I cut
pasted it character for character out of the bugzilla titles, and
received no comments or
Walter Bright, el 17 de February a las 19:54 me escribiste:
If someone wants to step up and take charge of doing a better job
with the changelog, I'm all for it. The old way was NOT a better
job. It was usually left to me (and Jonathan) to try to cobble
something together. When I was the only
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:55:39 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:07:58 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Again, the problem is making the changelog update optional! No
pull
request should be merged if it doesn't include a proper
changelog entry,
that's how
Am Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:05:10 +0100
schrieb Leandro Lucarella l...@llucax.com.ar:
Steven Schveighoffer, el 17 de February a las 22:36 me escribiste:
Also, anyone can go in and change the bugzilla issue titles to
make them more readable.
That actually is not a good thing... Anyone can
Am Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:10:27 +0100
schrieb Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com:
For the next release I propose that we get more involved in the
release process:
- We make an agreement on when exactly a release is made, without
wondering when Walter might end up doing it himself.
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:55:39 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:07:58 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Again, the problem is making the changelog update optional! No
pull
request should be merged if it doesn't include a proper
changelog entry,
that's how
dlangspec v2.062 in several formats:
dlangspec.chm http://d-packages.googlecode.com/files/dlangspec.chm
dlangspec.epub http://d-packages.googlecode.com/files/dlangspec.epub
dlangspec.mobi http://d-packages.googlecode.com/files/dlangspec.mobi
dlangspec.pdf
On 2/17/13 5:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-17 21:22, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Since it's not yet implemented, it could be like that, or it can be that
it is evaluated when you execute the program (but not at compile time).
But if I just but code that the top level of a file, when at
On 2013-02-18 13:46, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
In the order it was analyzed. Same as in Ruby.
I see.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
David Nadlinger, el 18 de February a las 11:55 me escribiste:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 10:07:58 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Again, the problem is making the changelog update optional! No
pull
request should be merged if it doesn't include a proper changelog
entry,
that's how it's
Steven Schveighoffer, el 18 de February a las 00:37 me escribiste:
I propose that when you post the beta on the mailing list, you also
post the reports of the fixed bugs and enhancements. Then people
can edit the descriptions before the release. Then I think after
the release, the
18-Feb-2013 17:22, Leandro Lucarella пишет:
I also would love to see an automatically generated changelog
similar to the original based on the bugzilla data. Can we add a
changelog description field to bug reports so if the bug
description (which arguably shouldn't be changed) isn't a very good
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:31:47 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:18 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Compare the earlier changelogs with the bugzilla entries.
18-Feb-2013 13:18, Dmitry Olshansky пишет:
18-Feb-2013 11:31, Walter Bright пишет:
On 2/17/2013 11:23 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 07:31, Walter Bright wrote:
Since I (and Jonathan) wrote the changelog, I can attest that I cut
pasted it character for character out of the bugzilla
Must be a problem with mobile Chrome then. Probably not specific to the new
change log handling. In chrome that entire content pane has a tendency to
disappear.
--bb
Sent from my Android.
On Feb 17, 2013 11:20 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 5:40 PM, Bill Baxter
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are
there.
Has anyone even tested the release package? I get
make: *** No rule to make target `../VERSION', needed by
Am Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:02:20 -0800
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
I didn't read the whole thread now. Just reporting that
the .zip package cannot be compiled due to
Am 18.02.2013 01:22, schrieb Tucker Taft:
On Sunday, 10 February 2013 at 09:50:30 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Hi,
some might find this interesting.
A presentation about the ParaSail, system programming language based
on Ada. ...
ParaSail is not really based on Ada, but it does try to
On Monday, February 18, 2013 18:43:37 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
18-Feb-2013 17:22, Leandro Lucarella пишет:
I also would love to see an automatically generated changelog
similar to the original based on the bugzilla data. Can we add a
changelog description field to bug reports so if the bug
On 2/18/2013 8:47 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
Must be a problem with mobile Chrome then. Probably not specific to the new
change log handling. In chrome that entire content pane has a tendency to
disappear.
I'm still not sure if you're referring to the changelog.html page or the
bugzilla page.
On 2/18/2013 9:02 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
Has anyone even tested the release package? I get
make: *** No
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/18r7zk/a_mathematician_looks_at_d/
No REPL, I guess we are rubbish?
Personally I find REPLs super annoying, especially when you need
to import or require something or like to use multiple lines.
Serious how hard is it to just do:
### Ruby
#!/usr/bin/ruby
require pp
puts do stuff
// D
#!/usr/bin/rdmd
import std.stdio;
void main() {
writeln(do stuff);
}
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:31:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I've lost the motivation to even look at the changelog now.
+1
Joshua Niehus:
Serious how hard is it to just do:
then press Command+b (Sublime text) and watch it work/fail?
With a REPL you don't need to repeat the precedent computations
every time you add something. You keep building on what you have
already done. This saves you time (beside saving you
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:37:00 +0100
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
A REPL is handy when you don't know the correct usage of
something: you try something, read the error it gives you, ask
for some help to the system, and try again, etc.
I can do that just as easily without a
On 2/18/13, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I agree we need to improve on this. One way to achieve that, seeing as
marketing is not Walter's focus, is to denote a release czar who has
that particular task around releases. Andrej, would you want to try that
role?
How
On 2/19/13, Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
How about writing one for 2.062 that can be inserted into the change log
instead of the current links rather than a mockup that might represent
what a change log might look like?
Yes. I'll get to it and make a pull request once it's ready.
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
Argh the chm generation is awful now.
I mean when I try to generate the .chm file myself. I can see now
there's a d.chm file in
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Error while processing file: .\spec.html
object.Error: Access Violation
I've filed it: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:55:44 +0100
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
I can do that just as easily without a REPL.
With a much reduced interactivity and more slowly.
Slightly so. I wouldn't say much.
But of course, I'm not saying that a REPL wouldn't be nice
Joshua Niehus:
I'll take your word for it, in my narrow experience, I've found
REPLs slow me down.
Thankfully in most cases you are not forced to use it. I have met
several persons that don't like to use a REPL, for unknown
reasons. Different persons have a brain shaped in different ways.
On 2/18/2013 1:18 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till today).
That being said I've brought it up like 5 times already.
Must be not what you are looking
On 2/18/2013 6:46 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:31:47 -0500, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:18 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Compare the
Personally, I just wish there was a quick blurb at the top of the
changelog indicating the highlights of this release. For example,
with 2.058, the very first two lines of the changelog were:
Add new = lambda syntax.
Allow 1.userproperty syntax. NOTE: 1.f is no longer a float
literal, add a 0.
On 2013-02-19 07:25, Kapps wrote:
Personally, I just wish there was a quick blurb at the top of the
changelog indicating the highlights of this release. For example, with
2.058, the very first two lines of the changelog were:
Add new = lambda syntax.
Allow 1.userproperty syntax. NOTE: 1.f is no
41 matches
Mail list logo
