On 2013-02-19 01:28, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I can do that just as easily without a REPL.
With a much reduced interactivity and more slowly.
Slightly so. I wouldn't say much.
But of course, I'm not saying that a REPL wouldn't be nice to have.
Just saying that edit, re-compile/run really
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 01:36:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Joshua Niehus:
I'll take your word for it, in my narrow experience, I've
found REPLs slow me down.
Thankfully in most cases you are not forced to use it. I have
met several persons that don't like to use a REPL, for unknown
Am 18.02.2013 23:06, schrieb Joshua Niehus:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/18r7zk/a_mathematician_looks_at_d/
No REPL, I guess we are rubbish?
There once was this approach:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/fpmpa6$2muq$1...@digitalmars.com
Not full D, but the concept should be
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
The dlang changelog lists the release date as Jan 4, 2013, this is wrong.
http://dlang.org/changelog.html#new2_062
On 2/18/13, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till today).
That being said I've brought it up like 5 times already.
Must be not what you
19-Feb-2013 20:30, Andrej Mitrovic пишет:
On 2/18/13, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till today).
That being said I've brought it up
19-Feb-2013 21:00, Dmitry Olshansky пишет:
19-Feb-2013 20:30, Andrej Mitrovic пишет:
On 2/18/13, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.com wrote:
This D script dumps all fixed bugs between 2 dates as DDOC entries.
https://gist.github.com/blackwhale/3734045
(or just starting from one date till
On 2/18/2013 11:17 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-02-18 21:58, Walter Bright wrote:
I forgot to include VERSION in the zip file. Its contents are:
2.062
all on one line. I'll fix the packages.
Do you have an automated script for packing up the zip file? If not, this is the
time to
On 2/19/2013 8:10 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/18/13, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
The dlang changelog lists the release date as Jan 4, 2013, this is wrong.
http://dlang.org/changelog.html#new2_062
On 2/16/2013 10:28 PM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
https://github.com/manastech/crystal/wiki/Introduction
Just a thought - the Introduction needs an introductory (!) paragraph at the
beginning explaining what Crystal is, what its point is, and where it fits into
the universe of programming
On 2013-02-19 22:01, Walter Bright wrote:
Yes, I do use a script. The script has to copy all the correct files
over to the right place. VERSION is a new file in a new place, and the
script needed updating to copy that one.
Automation is great, and I use it. But files appear, disappear, and
Yes, that's because the web site was pushed from master rather
than the 2.062 branch.
http://dlang.org/phobos/index.html#std
Duplicates:
std: Core library modules
std.base64 Functions that operate on ASCII characters.
std.base64 Encode/decode base64 format.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:49:16 -0800, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
http://nwcpp.org/
See ya there!
I'll be there!
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 23:49:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://nwcpp.org/
See ya there!
Will it be recorded?
On 2/19/2013 6:07 PM, MattCoder wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 23:49:17 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://nwcpp.org/
See ya there!
Will it be recorded?
Yes, but sometimes the recording goes awry or is of erratic quality. It's not
done by an A/V professional.
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see now there's a d.chm file in \bin.
Walter that .chm file you're distributing in Windows\bin is v2.058
(judging by the changelog), or some other version, but it definitely
isn't the latest because documentation is missing
On 2/19/2013 8:29 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 2/19/13, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see now there's a d.chm file in \bin.
Walter that .chm file you're distributing in Windows\bin is v2.058
(judging by the changelog), or some other version, but it definitely
isn't
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:31:47 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
But I just want to throw in my 2 cents about the new changelog
format. It's impossible now to tell at a glance what the major
changes/fixes are. Clicking through four links to find them is
bad enough, but the layout and color
On 02/19/2013 09:57 PM, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Each developer who works on bugs and enhancements for a given release
can keep a private journal, some small text file somewhere.
+1
Although, I have seen this done in Bugzilla itself: Every bug has a
field that contains what goes into the
19 matches
Mail list logo
