Walter Bright:
http://nwcpp.org/static/talks/2013/ComponentProgrammingInD.pdf
Thank you for the slides.
Regarding slide 38, in D code like this I often forget what's the
source and the destination:
foo.copy(bar);
A "copyTo" function name is more clear for me:
foo.copyTo(bar);
Regarding
Whoops, thought I was replying to the message from Lloyd that I saw in my
inbox earlier today.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> +1! Also might I suggest making NWCPP accounts on
> Facebook/Twitter/Google+ from which you can push out these sorts of
> announcements?
> The gr
+1! Also might I suggest making NWCPP accounts on Facebook/Twitter/Google+
from which you can push out these sorts of announcements?
The great thing about having the meeting announcements on those is that
people can really easily reshare them to all their followers, thereby
expanding the reach of
On 2/22/13, Maxim Fomin wrote:
> By the way, this
> also indicates that situation with D changelog is not
> satisfactory either.
Yes, hopefully we can improve this. As a start I made this pull which
lists language changes at the top:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-languag
I just received this from Lloyd, who runs NWCPP:
-
Folks,
First off I would like to thank everyone who donated to our camera drive. This
month was the first session recorded using the new camera setup and I think you
will agree it is a BIG improve
On Friday, 22 February 2013 at 20:00:58 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/22/2013 11:29 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Ali
Çehreli wrote:
On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and
'alias this'.
I just lea
On 02/22/2013 11:29 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and 'alias this'.
I just learned that 'alias this' has been converted to the old syntax in
2.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>
>> I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and 'alias this'.
>
> I just learned that 'alias this' has been converted to the old syntax in
> 2.062. I can't find any obvious indicator i
On 02/01/2013 03:55 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
> I like how you introduce the new syntax for 'alias' and 'alias this'.
I just learned that 'alias this' has been converted to the old syntax in
2.062. I can't find any obvious indicator in the changelog.
Ali