Am Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:53:13 +0200
schrieb Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com:
On Thursday, 20 June 2013 at 20:47:19 UTC, Michael wrote:
Also 3 types of pointers scares me.
This actually doesn't scare me because it is kinda useful for
certain situations. However, I don't think it
On Sunday, 23 June 2013 at 15:30:16 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
They have compiler support which removes the syntactical noise
of
templates and makes them behave more natural.
Indeed. I don't mind the syntax (actually, I prefer RefCounted!T
to ~T or whatever symbol rust uses) but there's some
On 6/19/2013 11:02 PM, Kai Nacke wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 June 2013 at 20:40:39 UTC, qznc wrote:
LDC is explicitly mentioned in the LLVM 3.3 Release Notes [0]. In contrast
to other frontends, LDC seems to follow upstream much more closely (or
maybe is forced to due to bugs?).
Anyhow, kudos to
Manu:
This is interesting. I didn't know about this.
An important thing here is: what's the semantics present in that
language that is missing in D (and that is useful for the
optimizer)? Is it possible/worth to add it?
Bye,
bearophile
Jacob Carlborg:
http://michelf.ca/projects/d-objc/syntax/
Instead of:
extern (Objective-C)
Is it better to use a naming more D-idiomatic?
extern (Objective_C)
Regarding this syntax:
void insertItem(ObjcObject object, NSInteger value)
[insertItemWithObjectValue:atIndex:];
Is it
On 2013-06-23, 23:02, bearophile wrote:
Jacob Carlborg:
http://michelf.ca/projects/d-objc/syntax/
Instead of:
extern (Objective-C)
Is it better to use a naming more D-idiomatic?
extern (Objective_C)
There's already some precedence in extern (C++).
--
Simen
