On Friday, November 11, 2016 14:36:59 Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 08:30 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> > On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 13:21:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> Run the new dmd. If it fails, either fix your code or go temporarily
> >> go back to the
On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 06:52:12 UTC, Olivier Pisano
wrote:
I cannot read your website on Firefox 45 (no text is
displayed). It works on chromium anyway.
FWIW it should work now
On 11/11/16 3:02 PM, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I've gone through a lot of compiler upgrades on a lot of D projects,
and in my experience, this "investigate and fix for the new dmd" has
always been trivial (aside from one instance where
Warm-up for mind. Visual Basic 6 is used as framework for DLL on
D. Calls of functions from VB to D and from D to VB are available
that allows to control the form on VB directly from DLL on D.
https://pp.vk.me/c638421/v638421885/9bee/0KJYM0QafWQ.jpg
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I've gone through a lot of compiler upgrades on a lot of D
projects, and in my experience, this "investigate and fix for
the new dmd" has always been trivial (aside from one instance
where Phobos's standard function
On 11/11/2016 08:30 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 13:21:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Run the new dmd. If it fails, either fix your code or go temporarily
go back to the old dmd until you can fix your code.
D will never be considered production ready as pong as this
On 11/11/16 9:02 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On 11/11/2016 03:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
... or one can spend one extra hour to implement deprecation path and
the issue disappears completely.
There is a misunderstanding that the new cycle detection is an "upgrade"
of some kind. It's a bug fix.
On 11/11/16 9:06 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 11.11.2016 14:42, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The option to ignore the cycles is there, added to allow for people to
use the new DMD even if cycles exist. However, it is a runtime switch,
which means you have to run it that way.
You can also
On 11.11.2016 14:42, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/11/16 8:21 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 11/11/2016 04:54 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 13:58:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Only possibility is just to ignore ALL cycles, and print them if any
are detected.
On 11/11/2016 03:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> ... or one can spend one extra hour to implement deprecation path and
>> the issue disappears completely.
>
> There is a misunderstanding that the new cycle detection is an "upgrade"
> of some kind. It's a bug fix.
There is no difference
On 11/11/16 8:30 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 13:21:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Run the new dmd. If it fails, either fix your code or go temporarily
go back to the old dmd until you can fix your code.
D will never be considered production ready as pong as this attiude
On 11/11/16 8:21 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 11/11/2016 04:54 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 13:58:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Only possibility is just to ignore ALL cycles, and print them if any
are detected.
Run the new detector and if it fails, run the old
On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 13:21:40 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Run the new dmd. If it fails, either fix your code or go
temporarily go back to the old dmd until you can fix your code.
D will never be considered production ready as pong as this
attiude remaind. Your described scenario in
On 11/11/2016 04:54 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 13:58:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Only possibility is just to ignore ALL cycles, and print them if any
are detected.
Run the new detector and if it fails, run the old one, if it succeeds,
print a message.
Or:
On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 13:58:56 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
Only possibility is just to ignore ALL cycles, and print them
if any are detected.
Run the new detector and if it fails, run the old one, if it
succeeds, print a message.
15 matches
Mail list logo
