On 6/3/18 20:51, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday (which is
today).
Some articles about the topic:
https://fossbytes.com/microsoft-github-aquisition-report/
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/3/17422752/microsoft-github-acquisition-rumors
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 19:26:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 19:06:52 UTC, Maksim Fomin wrote:
[...]
Unlikely, you don't spend $7.5 billion on a company because you
want to send a message that you're a good dev tools company,
then neglect it.
I suggest you look at their
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 19:26:23 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 19:06:52 UTC, Maksim Fomin wrote:
Unlikely, you don't spend $7.5 billion on a company because you
want to send a message that you're a good dev tools company,
then neglect it.
You have no idea about how big
On 6/4/18 2:46 PM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Of course MS does, since they spent $5 billion on it. They will try
their best to make profit out of it, just like they did with LinkedIn.
$7.5 billion.
-Steve
On 6/3/18 11:51 PM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday (which is
today).
Some articles about the topic:
https://fossbytes.com/microsoft-github-aquisition-report/
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/3/17422752/microsoft-github-acquisition-rumors
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 19:06:52 UTC, Maksim Fomin wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 08:42:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2018 8:51 PM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday
(which is today).
We'll stay on Github as long as it continues to
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 08:42:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2018 8:51 PM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday
(which is today).
We'll stay on Github as long as it continues to serve our
interests, which it has done very well, and I have
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 18:17:24 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 09:47:58 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Oh look, rumours are confirmed:
https://itsfoss.com/microsoft-github/
MS bought GitHub for $5 billion.
It's official, Nat Friedman, formerly of Xamarin, is the new
CEO:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 09:47:58 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
Oh look, rumours are confirmed:
https://itsfoss.com/microsoft-github/
MS bought GitHub for $5 billion.
It's official, Nat Friedman, formerly of Xamarin, is the new CEO:
https://blog.github.com/2018-06-04-github-microsoft/
MS is
On 6/4/18 1:51 PM, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 15:52:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/2/18 3:23 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
I like the article, but was taken aback a bit by this quote: "for
example, a PR to fix a bug in a specific piece of code mustn’t also
edit the
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 15:52:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/2/18 3:23 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
I like the article, but was taken aback a bit by this quote:
"for example, a PR to fix a bug in a specific piece of code
mustn’t also edit the documentation of that function."
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 11:14 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer via
[…]
> I just submitted a PR to fix
> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18934
>
> I used stable. I'm hoping it could get in for this release.
>
> https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6544
>
> -Steve
So am I.
--
Russel.
On 05/06/2018 3:45 AM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 11:28:26 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Thought: Couldn't we have alternative names in the parameter
instead? E.g.
```D
void foo(int x/x0/width, int y/y0/height){}
```
This intuitively means that any combination of the
On 6/2/18 3:23 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
In this post for the D Blog, Jack Stouffer details how dscanner is used
in the Phobos development process to help improve code quality and fight
entropy.
The blog:
https://dlang.org/blog/2018/06/02/driving-continuous-improvement-in-d/
reddit:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 15:08:01 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
In many respects, they're better behaved than they used to be.
They're biggest problems seem to have to do with what they're
doing with Windows (e.g. tracking what you're doing and not
letting you turn it off). It's certainly not
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 11:28:26 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
Thought: Couldn't we have alternative names in the parameter
instead? E.g.
```D
void foo(int x/x0/width, int y/y0/height){}
```
This intuitively means that any combination of the parameter
names would work (e.g. (x, y0),
On 6/4/18 7:44 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
First beta for the 2.080.1 patch release.
Comes with a handful of fixes.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.080.1.html
Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org
On Monday, June 04, 2018 14:51:24 Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:50:26 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
> > I can think of hundreds of things what can go wrong including:
> > forcing users to use Microsoft accounts
>
> That didn't happen to skype yet.
> MS
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:50:26 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
I can think of hundreds of things what can go wrong including:
forcing users to use Microsoft accounts
That didn't happen to skype yet.
MS recently tries to mend its reputation, though the past will
linger for a while.
On 06/04/2018 02:25 PM, MrSmith wrote:
> Is [1] included in that release?
> [1] https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18821
Thanks for the reminder :), the fix was merged into master instead of
stable.
Just picked it over.
We usually avoid cherry-picking as it leads to unnecessary merge
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 11:44:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
First beta for the 2.080.1 patch release.
Comes with a handful of fixes.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.080.1.html
Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org
- -Martin
Is [1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
First beta for the 2.080.1 patch release.
Comes with a handful of fixes.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.080.1.html
Please report any bugs at https://issues.dlang.org
- -Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On 04/06/2018 10:39 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I've dwelt on this for a couple of months now, and keeping thinking on
it myself is not going to help. That's why I'm asking for feedback.
Hum
Changes possible usage syntax, given that the only attribute that does
this currently is @property which
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 10:30:18 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 04/06/2018 10:05 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:46:04 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
[...]
Not sure what you meant? This definitely does not error out:
https://godbolt.org/g/PAiFPw
```D
@named:
int
On 04/06/2018 10:05 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:46:04 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 04/06/2018 5:01 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
Named arguments lite
I'm concerned about this DIP (keep in mind I wrote a referenced WIP DIP).
1. Reordering of parameters that match (with
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:46:04 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 04/06/2018 5:01 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
Named arguments lite
I'm concerned about this DIP (keep in mind I wrote a referenced
WIP DIP).
1. Reordering of parameters that match (with overloads)
```D
int add(int a, int b);
int
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 09:38:57 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:50:26 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
I can think of hundreds of things what can go wrong including:
forcing users to use Microsoft accounts, advertising own
products, changing search to Bing (that's
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 08:42:08 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/3/2018 8:51 PM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday
(which is today).
We'll stay on Github as long as it continues to serve our
interests, which it has done very well, and I have
Oh look, rumours are confirmed:
https://itsfoss.com/microsoft-github/
MS bought GitHub for $5 billion.
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:50:26 UTC, Anton Fediushin wrote:
I can think of hundreds of things what can go wrong including:
forcing users to use Microsoft accounts, advertising own
products, changing search to Bing (that's pretty bad one, no
idea how I came up with it) and more and more.
On 6/3/2018 8:51 PM, Anton Fediushin wrote:
This is still just a rumour, we'll know the truth on Monday (which is today).
We'll stay on Github as long as it continues to serve our interests, which it
has done very well, and I have no reason to believe will change.
We have a number of ties
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 05:46:04 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 04/06/2018 5:01 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
Named arguments lite
I'm concerned about this DIP (keep in mind I wrote a referenced
WIP DIP).
The place for this sort of feedback is in the PR comments, not
here :-)
04.06.2018 09:02, Anton Fediushin пишет:
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 04:40:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On the bright side, maybe this will encourage online repo hosting to
become less of a monopoly as folks move elsewhere due to their
concerns about Microsoft.
- Jonathan M Davis
Can't
On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 04:40:44 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On the bright side, maybe this will encourage online repo
hosting to become less of a monopoly as folks move elsewhere
due to their concerns about Microsoft.
- Jonathan M Davis
Can't agree more: GitLab and Bitbucket deserve
34 matches
Mail list logo
