On Monday, 17 December 2018 at 21:38:07 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.084.0 release, ♥ to
the 51 contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.084.0.html
As usual please report any bugs at
https://issues.dlang.org
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:13:32AM +, Cyroxin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
[...]
> I would assume that there is much value in having a mapping that can
> be reused instead of having to remap files to the memory when a need
> arises to change source. While I cannot comment on the general
On Monday, 17 December 2018 at 22:31:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:16:16PM +, Cyroxin via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Elembuf is a library that allows writing efficient parsers and
readers. It looks as if it were just a regular T[], making it
work well with
On Monday, 17 December 2018 at 23:13:18 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
https://gma.abc/2zWvXCl
https://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.5569.1501666175.31550.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
https://gma.abc/2zWvXCl
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:16:16PM +, Cyroxin via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> Elembuf is a library that allows writing efficient parsers and
> readers. It looks as if it were just a regular T[], making it work
> well with libraries and easy to use with slicing. To avoid copying,
> the
Well, I am getting back into it:
http://dpldocs.info/this-week-in-d/Blog.Posted_2018_12_17.html
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.084.0 release, ♥ to the 51
contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.084.0.html
As usual please report any bugs at
https://issues.dlang.org
-Martin
Elembuf is a library that allows writing efficient parsers and
readers. It looks as if it were just a regular T[], making it
work well with libraries and easy to use with slicing. To avoid
copying, the buffer can only be at maximum one page long.
Internally it is a circular buffer with memory
On 12/15/2018 11:53 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
@safe and pure though...
@safe is not so hard to adopt, since by using @trusted one can proceed
incrementally.
Going pure, however, is much harder (at least for me) because I'm not used to
programming that way. Making a function pure often
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 at 00:17:55 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
There's something important you're glossing over here, which is
that, in the general case, there's no single obvious or natural
way to compose two DAGs together.
For example: suppose project A's DAG has two "output" vertices
On Monday, 17 December 2018 at 09:41:01 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 15 December 2018 at 19:53:06 UTC, Atila Neves
wrote:
@safe and pure though...
Why @safe? Can't you just write "@safe:" on top and switch to
@system/@trusted as needed?
Not quite. It doesn't work the way most people
On Monday, 17 December 2018 at 10:12:44 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 at 14:24:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2018-12-15 16:37, Basile B. wrote:
This poisoning kills the interest of using a fuzzer. 99% of
the crashes will be in hdrgen.
Does that matter as long as the
On Sunday, 16 December 2018 at 14:24:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-12-15 16:37, Basile B. wrote:
This poisoning kills the interest of using a fuzzer. 99% of
the crashes will be in hdrgen.
Does that matter as long as the bug is found?
Well it's hard to tell if it's begin.
Generally
On Saturday, 15 December 2018 at 19:53:06 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
@safe and pure though...
Why @safe? Can't you just write "@safe:" on top and switch to
@system/@trusted as needed?
On Monday, 17 December 2018 at 09:41:01 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Saturday, 15 December 2018 at 19:53:06 UTC, Atila Neves
wrote:
@safe and pure though...
Why @safe? Can't you just write "@safe:" on top and switch to
@system/@trusted as needed?
Argh, I forgot that you are not supposed to @safe
On Sat, 2018-12-15 at 19:53 +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Saturday, 15 December 2018 at 02:16:36 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
> > On Thursday, 13 December 2018 at 10:14:45 UTC, Atila Neves
> > wrote:
> > > My impression is that it's a consensus that it _should_, but
> > >
17 matches
Mail list logo
