Re: Sublime Text Syntax Definition Rewrite

2019-03-01 Thread owwmid via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 28 February 2019 at 00:30:24 UTC, Benjamin Schaaf wrote: Hello all, I've recently gotten a massive rewrite of the D syntax highlighting merged into the Sublime Text default packages. This has since been deployed in the most recent development version 3192 (license required) and

Re: Project Highlight: Spasm

2019-03-01 Thread Jordan Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 14:27:36 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 13:26:58 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote: I am very much interested in qualitative feedback on spasm's internals and its design. It is the main reason I announced the project. I am completely willing to

Re: Project Highlight: Spasm

2019-03-01 Thread Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 14:27:36 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: That would be awesome. I initially tried very hard to stick to React/JSX functional rendering. I could not find a way to make it a zero-cost abstraction, but maybe you have more success! I'll create an issue once I've written

Re: Project Highlight: Spasm

2019-03-01 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 13:26:58 UTC, Olivier FAURE wrote: Would the author be interested in structural level-feedback? As in, not "I wish there was this feature", but "I think the way you're doing X and Y is wrong, and the project would probably benefit from a complete refactoring". I

Re: Project Highlight: Spasm

2019-03-01 Thread Olivier FAURE via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Thursday, 28 February 2019 at 12:24:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: The Blog: https://dlang.org/blog/2019/02/28/project-highlight-spasm/ Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/avqioi/spasm_d_to_webassembly_for_single_page_apps/ I've seen spasm around quite a few times, but

Re: Project Highlight: Spasm

2019-03-01 Thread Radu via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 08:22:24 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote: On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 07:28:06 UTC, Radu wrote: Dip1000 would make reference counting safe. Memory management should be handled by reference counting. RC should delegate malloc, free to an allocator. I see. Yeah, RC could

Re: Project Highlight: Spasm

2019-03-01 Thread Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 1 March 2019 at 07:28:06 UTC, Radu wrote: Dip1000 would make reference counting safe. Memory management should be handled by reference counting. RC should delegate malloc, free to an allocator. I see. Yeah, RC could work. Sure. Hence my suggestion to implement a typed malloc.