On 4/6/19 6:30 PM, bauss wrote:
Just going to respond to this:
"If you haven’t visited the site in a while, you’ll surely notice that
it’s been redesigned. The old version was not responsive and was quite
annoying to manipulate on small screens."
The design is terrible and it really looks
Hello,
the new release of Visual D has just been uploaded. Some major
improvements of 0.49.0:
* support for Visual Studio 2019
* parallel compilation supported by VC projects
* catch up with recent language changes
* new "Language" configuration page for -transition=/-preview=/-revert=
options
On Sunday, 7 April 2019 at 14:26:16 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
Were there some changes to the shared phobos unittest runners
between beta2 and the final release?
I ask because I have the problem on macOS with the final
release that libphobos2-ldc-unittest-shared.85.dylib is not
fixed by my
On Saturday, 6 April 2019 at 17:40:39 UTC, kinke wrote:
Glad to announce LDC 1.15:
* Based on D 2.085.1.
* Support for LLVM 8.0. The prebuilt packages ship with LLVM
8.0.0 and include the Khronos SPIRV-LLVM-Translator, so that
dcompute can now emit OpenCL too.
* New -lowmem switch to enable
Am 07.04.2019 um 09:09 schrieb bauss:
On Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 11:25:34 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 10:49:46 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
Hunt time released the first beta version.
hunt-time is a time library and similar to Joda-time and Java.time api.
[...]
I am not
On Friday, 5 April 2019 at 12:03:48 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
http://code.dlang.org/packages/jupyter_wire
It's now possible to send markdown or HTML to a jupyter
notebook from D:
return markdownResult("# Header");
Simple, but looks pretty.
Thanks Atila for all your great work and projects!
On Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 11:25:34 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Thursday, 4 April 2019 at 10:49:46 UTC, zoujiaqing wrote:
Hunt time released the first beta version.
hunt-time is a time library and similar to Joda-time and
Java.time api.
[...]
I am not sure but did you rewrote the
On Sunday, 7 April 2019 at 06:19:31 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 6 April 2019 at 22:30:58 UTC, bauss wrote:
The design is terrible and it really looks unprofessional.
While the old site wasn't responsive, the design was at least
slightly better.
It just doesn't look very well done.
On Saturday, 6 April 2019 at 22:30:58 UTC, bauss wrote:
The design is terrible and it really looks unprofessional.
While the old site wasn't responsive, the design was at least
slightly better.
It just doesn't look very well done.
I'm not trying to be negative or anything, but it looks
