Andrei's talk on Binding Rvalues to ref Parameters

2019-06-07 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/bxv5tf/dconf_2019_binding_rvalues_to_ref_parameters/

Atila's talk on Frictionless D Adoption

2019-06-07 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/bxull9/frictionless_d_adoption_for_the_masses/

Re: Revisions to the DIP Process

2019-06-07 Thread Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 12:12:25 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:19:07 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:02:29 UTC, mate wrote: On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's

Re: Revisions to the DIP Process

2019-06-07 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:19:07 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:02:29 UTC, mate wrote: On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's announcement at the beginning of the AGM:

Re: Revisions to the DIP Process

2019-06-07 Thread Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 11:02:29 UTC, mate wrote: On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: No, the text is correct as published. See Andrei's announcement at the beginning of the AGM: https://youtu.be/cpTAtiboIDs?t=3041 I've seen the AGM, but doesn't that worth a post

Re: Revisions to the DIP Process

2019-06-07 Thread mate via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:57:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:50:37 UTC, mate wrote: Thanks for your work. In the blog post did not you rather mean the following? Any fundamental structural changes will need approval by Walter and Andrei. If yes please review

Re: Revisions to the DIP Process

2019-06-07 Thread Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Friday, 7 June 2019 at 10:50:37 UTC, mate wrote: Thanks for your work. In the blog post did not you rather mean the following? Any fundamental structural changes will need approval by Walter and Andrei. If yes please review the penultimate sentence of the post. No, the text is

Re: Revisions to the DIP Process

2019-06-07 Thread mate via Digitalmars-d-announce
On Tuesday, 4 June 2019 at 12:30:13 UTC, Mike Parker wrote: In response to concerns raised at the DConf AGM (and also feedback here in the forums), I've updated the documentation for the DIP process and the DIP author guidelines, and I've added guidelines for reviewers. It's all summarized in