On Sunday, 6 October 2019 at 02:33:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/5/2019 6:58 AM, Seb wrote:
Phobos is essentially dead/frozen (feature-wise).
I beg to disagree. A couple cases in point:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7211
which is a re-imagining, rethinking of hexString.
I'm
On 10/5/2019 6:58 AM, Seb wrote:
Phobos is essentially dead/frozen (feature-wise).
I beg to disagree. A couple cases in point:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7211
which is a re-imagining, rethinking of hexString.
and:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7130
I wonder about the generated Assembly:
In Rust if u add #[repr(usize)] to the enum the generated code as
only two lines.
In D, Look like the first assembly lines are checking for
errors(or out of bounds index?).
But why if this is a final switch? (also assert(0); at the end
don´t help )
On 10/5/19 7:58 AM, Seb wrote:
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 06:40:35 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran wrote:
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options we
have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 13:58:52 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 06:40:35 UTC, Arun
Chandrasekaran wrote:
Good one. Any plans to push SumType as a replacement of
Phobo's Algebraic?
Phobos is essentially dead/frozen (feature-wise). Though if
someone ever manages to get
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 04:07:45 UTC, Meta wrote:
I'm not sure if you're aware, but funnily enough, I also wrote
an article[1] on std::variant vs. the D alternative that
references Matt Kline's article on std::visit. It seems we're
really making getting our money's worth from his
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 12:27:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options
we have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
comparison of the generated assembly for
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 06:40:35 UTC, Arun Chandrasekaran
wrote:
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options
we have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
comparison of the generated
On Friday, 4 October 2019 at 10:22:56 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
The latest post on the blog details some new funding
initiatives from the D Language Foundation. This includes
putting some of the HR Fund to use and seeding the first two of
a set of forthcoming Bugzilla bounties.
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options
we have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
comparison of the generated assembly for each of them. You can
read about it at the link below. And as you
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options
we have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
comparison of the generated assembly for each of them. You can
read about it at the link below. And as you
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options
we have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
comparison of the generated assembly for each of them. You can
read about it at the link below. And as you
On Saturday, 5 October 2019 at 02:59:58 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
I was curious how C++17's std::variant compared to the options
we have in D, like Algebraic and SumType, so I did a simple
comparison of the generated assembly for each of them. You can
read about it at the link below. And as you
13 matches
Mail list logo
