On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 20:13:23 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:45:16 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
That's a bit sad. I understand that in your position it may be
hard to express a personnal opinion but I think
On 9/17/2020 6:42 AM, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
That being said, does the new feature imply any change in the *parameters*
themselves?
No.
I.e. are there changes in the way the function is defined,
No.
not only in the way it is called?
It only affects calling syntax in providing an
On 9/17/20 8:58 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
So they decided that a new `std.traits` template and a corresponding
`__traits` option are needed which expand into the exact function
signature of another function.
This, sounds great. I'd love to see the specifics for this.
Also, I am very much
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
[...]
Calls for celebration... who's in?
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:45:16 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
That's a bit sad. I understand that in your position it may be
hard to express a personnal opinion but I think anyone should get
the opportunity to do so. Would you like, in no
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
I would really want to see tuples ...
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:45:16 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:42:47 UTC, Jean-Louis
Leroy wrote:
this point I have some hope that the DIP is not damaging in
the way Mike thinks.
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
OK, s/thinks/reports/
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:42:47 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy
wrote:
this point I have some hope that the DIP is not damaging in the
way Mike thinks.
What Mike thinks appears nowhere in my post :-)
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 13:23:38 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy
wrote:
Actually, Parameters!origFun will carry storage classes, UDAs,
etc for all the parameters. And Parameters!origFun[0..1] (note
the two dots) will carry everything about the first parameter.
The trouble begins when, for some
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:59:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1030.md
YES, YES, YES, I had argue in favor of
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
During the assessment, Walter and Atila had a discussion
regarding this particular criticism:
https://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.1117.1581368593.31109.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
"Named arguments breaks this very important pattern:
auto
On Thursday, 17 September 2020 at 12:58:06 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
DIP 1030, "Named Arguments", has been accepted.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1030.md
On Wednesday, 16 September 2020 at 18:52:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2020-09-16 19:20, mw wrote:
Why it's deprecated? can we revive it?
It was deprecated because it's a bad idea to not lock versions.
Using `~master` would fetch the latest code from the "master"
branch when compiling.
14 matches
Mail list logo
