On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 21:19:02 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 21:09:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:40:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]
Okay, fair enough. Should this still not have had approval
from either Walter or Atila before being merged in? Or is
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 21:09:55 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:40:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
[...]
Okay, fair enough. Should this still not have had approval from
either Walter or Atila before being merged in? Or is that not
the case for changes behind -preview?
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:40:39 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 18:29:14 UTC, Meta wrote:
I've read the discussion but skipped the presentation. All I
see is Atila expressing distaste for the compiler choosing how
to pass values, and no explicit sign-off from either
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 20:37:04 UTC, kinke wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 18:29:14 UTC, Meta wrote:
If W or A did approve it and I just wasn't aware, then I
apologize and retract my objection.
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11000#issuecomment-675605193
As far as I
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 18:29:14 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 17:29:56 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:47:37 UTC, Meta wrote:
[...]
Yes we have a 3rd way. Because `auto ref` just doesn't cut it
for most usages, and
Glad to announce the first beta for LDC 1.24:
- Based on D 2.094.0+.
- Support for LLVM 11.
The prebuilt packages use v11.0.0-rc4+, and the x86 packages
newly include the LLVM backend for AMD GPUs.
Full release log and downloads:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:47:37 UTC, Meta wrote:
This seems ridiculous to me. We now have ANOTHER way of asking
the compiler to choose for us whether to pass by ref or by
value, completely mutually exclusive of auto ref. Where was the
DIP (apologies if I just didn't see it)? Did
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:47:37 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:19:48 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/1/20 10:36 AM, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 09:49:36 UTC, Mathias LANG
wrote:
Author here. The most complete way to know would be to read
the
On 10/1/20 12:47 PM, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:19:48 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
There is a difference. `in` is choosing it based on the type, not
whether it's an rvalue or lvalue. auto ref doesn't care whether it's
an int or a 1k-sized struct, if it's an lvalue,
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:19:48 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/1/20 10:36 AM, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 09:49:36 UTC, Mathias LANG
wrote:
Author here. The most complete way to know would be to read
the changelog:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 09:49:36 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
[snip]
Author here. The most complete way to know would be to read the
changelog: https://dlang.org/changelog/2.094.0.html#preview-in
The TL;DR is that, in addition to `const scope`, `in` now
automatically behaves as `ref` when
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 16:44:09 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[snip]
Typo from the link
"However, this didn't really capture the intended meaning of
in: the be applied on input parameters. "
It looks like that whole paragraph has a bunch of typos...
On 10/1/20 10:36 AM, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 09:49:36 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
Author here. The most complete way to know would be to read the
changelog: https://dlang.org/changelog/2.094.0.html#preview-in
The TL;DR is that, in addition to `const scope`, `in` now
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 09:49:36 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
Author here. The most complete way to know would be to read the
changelog: https://dlang.org/changelog/2.094.0.html#preview-in
The TL;DR is that, in addition to `const scope`, `in` now
automatically behaves as `ref` when "it makes
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 08:31:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
[..]
Great news, thank you Iain and everyone else who was responsible!
I think an overview of those D projects would make for a great
DConf talk!
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 07:02:12 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 19:20:34 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 22:12:17 UTC, Imperatorn
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 21:45:09 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.094.0, ♥ to
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 08:31:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
I would like to thank dunnhumby for being supportive throughout
the entire process, and for handling the transition in a
gracious
fashion since operations began winding down.
I would second those thanks, and would also like
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 07:43:38 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 08:31:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Tsunami is a set of core libraries, applications, and tools
that were used at
sociomantic labs/dunnhumby Germany, and have been available as
On Wednesday, 30 September 2020 at 08:31:25 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Tsunami is a set of core libraries, applications, and tools
that were used at
sociomantic labs/dunnhumby Germany, and have been available as
open-source
software since 2017 under the direction and management
On Thursday, 1 October 2020 at 07:02:12 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 19:20:34 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 22:12:17 UTC, Imperatorn
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 21:45:09 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.094.0, ♥ to
On Sunday, 27 September 2020 at 19:20:34 UTC, Daniel N wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 22:12:17 UTC, Imperatorn
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2020 at 21:45:09 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
Glad to announce D 2.094.0, ♥ to the 49 contributors.
This release comes with faster compiler
21 matches
Mail list logo
