On 12/20/2020 5:21 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Glad to announce the first beta for the 2.095.0 release, ♥ to the 61
contributors.
http://dlang.org/download.html#dmd_beta
http://dlang.org/changelog/2.095.0.html
As usual please report any bugs at
https://issues.dlang.org
-Martin
Thank you, Marti
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 21:59:31 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
My point is that the result without -de is
[...]
Which unfortunately is pretty useless in my case ...
Could you point me towards the code that triggers this ?
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 18:05:30 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 11:38:11 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that the deprecation is coming from an external
library, it would be great to have the precise instantiation
point in that source code, so I w
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 11:38:11 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that the deprecation is coming from an external
library, it would be great to have the precise instantiation
point in that source code, so I was wondering if that dmd
improvement [1] should print a more detail
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 14:14:33 UTC, 9il wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 14:08:32 UTC, welkam wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 18:05:40 UTC, 9il wrote:
It was a mockery executed by Atila
Read the all comments and didnt saw any mockery
Yes, it wasn't explicit. He did
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 15:00:16 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
That Foo-ish reminds me of something in D like
static if (__traits(compiles, {
auto temp = Foo!T.init;
}))
Yes, it is similar in spirit. It is pretty much the same as the
C++17 version, but easier to write, especiall
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 09:56:50 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
[snip]
I don't use concepts yet as it is a very new C++ feature. The
following code does not work in XCode, although it probably
should according to cppreference. So take this with a grain of
salt (other variations shou
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 14:08:32 UTC, welkam wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 18:05:40 UTC, 9il wrote:
It was a mockery executed by Atila
Read the all comments and didnt saw any mockery
Yes, it wasn't explicit. He didn't write bad words, he did a bad
decision. Bad for D.
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 18:05:40 UTC, 9il wrote:
It was a mockery executed by Atila
Read the all comments and didnt saw any mockery
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 11:05:16 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 20:56:26 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
[...]
Non-concept version is more verbose, but yeah, works fine in
C++17:
namespace detail {
template class F, class U>
static constexpr void _dumm
On Thursday, 24 December 2020 at 11:05:14 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 15:38:17 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
What is happening is that some speculative compilation is
checking something via the get function. It might not make a
difference, but the error messa
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 20:56:26 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
concept Bar(T) = requires(U)() {
Foo!U; //akin to something like typename T::Foo;
}
where we would basically be telling the compiler that T has to
be a Foo!U, which would mean you would have to use Bar like
Bar!U...at least that'
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 15:38:17 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
What is happening is that some speculative compilation is
checking something via the get function. It might not make a
difference, but the error message is useless (who knows where
that traits call is triggered).
FY
On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 20:56:26 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
doing similar things). Abusing C++'s syntax you might have
something like
concept Bar(T) = requires(U)() {
Foo!U; //akin to something like typename T::Foo;
}
where we would basically be telling the compiler that T has to
be a Foo
14 matches
Mail list logo
